IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

A Post-Positivist Framework for Using and Building Theory in Online Instructional Design

A Post-Positivist Framework for Using and Building Theory in Online Instructional Design
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Bucky J. Dodd (University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond, OK, USA), Charles E. Baukal Jr. (University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA) and Lynna J. Ausburn (College of Education, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA)
Copyright: 2016
Volume: 6
Issue: 4
Pages: 18
Source title: International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Chia-Wen Tsai (Ming Chuan University, Taiwan) and Pei-Di Shen (Ming Chuan University, Taiwan)
DOI: 10.4018/IJOPCD.2016100104

Purchase

View A Post-Positivist Framework for Using and Building Theory in Online Instructional Design on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Theories are critical components of research and are widely used tools among online course development researchers and practitioners. However, enhanced knowledge about how theories are developed and change over time is a strategic need in the field of online education design and delivery. This article examines a set of theory analysis and development tools, focusing particularly on post-positivist frameworks and perspectives. Building from prior work in theory development, this paper makes several novel contributions to enhancing understanding of theory development processes and their use in online teaching and course design. Two unique theory analysis and development tools are proposed. The theory development diagnostic matrix is proposed as a tool for evaluating essential characteristics of theories and how theories may be appropriately used. The Theory-Innovation Cycle is introduced as a model for explaining how theories are created, developed, and changed over time and the influence these processes have on theory use in online education research and practice. Implications and recommendations for using these tools are also presented and discussed.

Related Content

A Peer Tutoring-Based Concept Mapping Approach to Improving Students' Learning Achievements and Attitudes for a Social Studies Course
Chien-Wen Chuang, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Wen-Jen Tsai. © 2018. 12 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Accessing Map Information Using NFC-Based User Interfaces for In-Situ Learning Environments
Ricardo Tesoriero, Habib M. Fardoun, Hachem Awada, Mahesh S. Raisinghani. © 2018. 16 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
A Polling-at-Home Approach to Improving Students' Learning Performance
Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun, Helena Seli, Brandon Martinez, Yu-Yan Lin. © 2018. 13 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Adapting the TPACK Framework for Online Teaching Within Higher Education
Fan Ouyang, Cassandra Scharber. © 2018. 18 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
A Pathway Towards Implementation of Blended Learning in a Medium Sized Canadian University
Maurice Taylor, Shehzad Ghani, Sait Atas, Michael Fairbrother. © 2018. 17 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
An Exploratory Study of Incorporating Blogfolios Into a College Writing Course
Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun, Geoffrey Middlebrook, Otto Khera, Ho-Yuan Chen. © 2018. 15 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Student Personality Characteristics Differ in MOOCs Versus Blended-Learning University Courses
Ada Le, Cho Kin Cheng, Steve Joordens. © 2018. 13 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Body Bottom