IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Differences in Business Process Management Leadership and Deployment: Is There a Connection to Industry Affiliation?

Differences in Business Process Management Leadership and Deployment: Is There a Connection to Industry Affiliation?
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Richard J. Goeke (Department of Accounting and Information Management, Widener University, Chester, PA, USA) and Yvonne Lederer Antonucci (Department of Accounting and Information Management, Widener University, Chester, PA, USA)
Copyright: 2013
Volume: 26
Issue: 2
Pages: 21
Source title: Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: George Kelley (University of Massachusetts, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/irmj.2013040103

Purchase


Abstract

Business Process Management (BPM) can improve organizational effectiveness and efficiency by optimizing the performance of cross-functional processes. Despite its potential, BPM deployment success has been mixed, due in part to the substantial changes required within the organization. Three changes considered necessary for BPM deployment success include a properly defined business process organizational infrastructure (complete with formal positions and competencies), boundary-spanning process ownership, and boundary-spanning process governance. However, given that BPM has largely been driven by practitioners, deployment details often vary by company. The present research examined the extent that these deployment details were industry related, and found significant differences between the manufacturing and service sectors in terms of organizational infrastructure and process ownership. These findings provide further evidence that a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to BPM does not exist, and that differences in BPM deployment decisions can be related to industry sector.

Related Content

Project Management and Scheduling through National Project Management Phases in Government Construction Agencies
Jesper Kranker Larsen, Thomas Ditlev Brunoe, Søren Munch Lindhard, Kim Noergaard Jensen. © 2017. 16 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Examination the Usefulness of Selected Classification Methods in the Pre-Qualification of Construction Contractors
Paweł Błaszczyk, Tomasz Błaszczyk. © 2017. 18 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Managing Software Risks in Maintenance Projects, from a Vendor Perspective: A Case Study in Global Software Development
Srikrishnan Sundararajan, M. Bhasi, K.V. Pramod. © 2017. 20 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation Approaches and the Performance of Procure-to-Pay Business Processes: (Field Study in Companies that Implement Oracle ERP in Jordan)
Ibrahim Kofahi, Haroun Alryalat. © 2017. 17 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Dynamics of Pledge Behavior of Crowdfunded Projects
Jaya Gera, Harmeet Kaur. © 2017. 15 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Exploring the Usage of Big Data Analytical Tools in Telecommunication Industry in Oman
Himyar Ali Al Jabri, Ali H. Al-Badi, Oualid Ali. © 2017. 14 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
New Causal Model for Brazilian Private Higher Education Institutions: A Dynamic Capability Perspective
Christiane Bischof-dos-Santos, Adriana Roseli Wünsch Takahashi, Mônica Maier Giacomini, Clarissa Figueiredo Rocha, Claudimar Pereira Da Veiga, Luiz Carlos Duclós. © 2017. 15 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Body Bottom