IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Heterogeneous vs. Homogeneous Groups: Methodology for Class Instruction for Post-Secondary Business Education Courses

Heterogeneous vs. Homogeneous Groups: Methodology for Class Instruction for Post-Secondary Business Education Courses
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Theodore E. Davis (State University of New York College at Buffalo, USA)
Copyright: 2012
Volume: 3
Issue: 1
Pages: 11
Source title: International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology (IJAVET)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Viktor Wang (California State University, USA), Judith E. Parker (Columbia University, USA)and Geraldine Torrisi-Steele (Griffith University, Australia)
DOI: 10.4018/javet.2012010104

Purchase


Abstract

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of racial and gender diversity on group process and problem solving in an academic setting. The importance of this dynamic is its value in preparing students for the workplace. The supposition is if a group is homogeneous, commitment and performance is improved. Data for the study was collected from upper-level undergraduate male and female students, registered in two sixteen week business courses taught by one instructor, at a large university in a metropolitan city in the northeastern United States. There were five racially mixed groups of seven members in each of the four sections of the two courses. During this period, group members met frequently for class projects, including a series of case analyses. Only balanced heterogeneous groups significantly enhanced their groups’ performance on complicated problem-solving tasks over time. They exceeded the performance of all homogeneous groups, except that of the black American female homogeneous groups. Ultimately, the academic grades of the balanced heterogeneous groups as well as their individual members were in the upper half of all grades issued.

Related Content

Catherine A. Cherrstrom. © 2024. 14 pages.
Andrew Schenck. © 2024. 17 pages.
Wonkyung Choi, Jun Jo, Geraldine Torrisi-Steele. © 2024. 20 pages.
Runtong He, Wei Xu, De Dong, Zhonggen Yu. © 2024. 28 pages.
. © 2024.
Julius Ceazar G. Tolentino, Josephine Luz De Leon-Pineda. © 2023. 12 pages.
Gülten Koşar. © 2023. 13 pages.
Body Bottom