IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Investigating Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering for Business Processes

Investigating Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering for Business Processes
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Geert Poels (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium), Ken Decreus (Deloitte Consulting, Diegem, Belgium), Ben Roelens (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium) and Monique Snoeck (Faculty of Economics and Business, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium)
Copyright: 2013
Volume: 24
Issue: 2
Pages: 37
Source title: Journal of Database Management (JDM)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Keng Siau (Missouri University of Science and Technology, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/jdm.2013040103

Purchase

View Investigating Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering for Business Processes on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Business processes are designed to execute strategies that aim at achieving organisational goals. During the last decade, several methods have been proposed that prescribe the use of goal-oriented requirements engineering techniques for supporting different business process management activities, in particular business process modelling. The integration of goal modelling and business process modelling aims at increasing the alignment between business strategies and the processes with their supporting IT systems. This new research area, which the authors call Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering for Business Processes (GORE-for-BP), is developing rapidly, but without a clear conceptualization of the focus and scope of the proposed GORE-for-BP methods. Furthermore, an overview is lacking of which methods exist and what their level of maturity is. This paper therefore presents a research review of the GORE-for-BP area, with the aim of identifying relevant methods and assessing their focus, scope, and maturity. This study used Systematic Literature Review and Method Meta-Modelling as research methods to identify and evaluate the state of the GORE-for-BP research area and to propose a research agenda for directing future research in the area. Nineteen methods were identified, which is an indication of an active research area. Although some similarities were found with respect to how goal models are transformed into business process models (or vice-versa), there is also considerable divergence in modelling languages used and the extent of coverage of typical requirements engineering and business process management lifecycle phases. Furthermore, the exploitation of requirements engineering techniques in the full business process management lifecycle is currently under researched. Also, the maturity of the methods found in terms of the formalisation of the transformation activity, the elaboration of method guidelines, and the extent to which methods are validated, can be further improved.

Related Content

Thirty Years Later: Some Reflections on Ontological Analysis in Conceptual Modeling
Yair Wand, Ron Weber. © 2017. 17 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Conceptual Modeling Meets Domain Ontology Development: A Reconciliation
Veda C. Storey. © 2017. 13 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
A Framework for Managing Complexity in Information Systems
Mala Kaul, Veda C. Storey, Carson Woo. © 2017. 12 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Improving the Domain Independence of Data Provenance Ontologies: A Demonstration Using Conceptual Graphs and the W7 Model
Jun Liu, Sudha Ram. © 2017. 20 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Evaluation of the Ontological Completeness and Clarity of Object-Oriented Conceptual Modelling Grammars
Prabodha Tilakaratna, Jayantha Rajapakse. © 2017. 26 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Effects of Domain Familiarity on Conceptual Modeling Performance
Jihae Suh, Jinsoo Park. © 2017. 29 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Combined Use of Conceptual Models in Practice: An Exploratory Study
Mohammad Ali Jabbari Sabegh, Jan Recker. © 2017. 33 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Body Bottom