IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Investigating the Use and Acceptance of Technologies by Professors in a Higher Education Institution

Investigating the Use and Acceptance of Technologies by Professors in a Higher Education Institution
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Carolina Costa (University of Aveiro, Portugal), Helena Alvelos (University of Aveiro, Portugal & Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP) Research Unit, Portugal)and Leonor Teixeira (University of Aveiro, Portugal)
Copyright: 2019
Volume: 9
Issue: 2
Pages: 20
Source title: International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Chia-Wen Tsai (Ming Chuan University, Taiwan)and Pei-Di Shen (Ming Chuan University, Taiwan)
DOI: 10.4018/IJOPCD.2019040101

Purchase

View Investigating the Use and Acceptance of Technologies by Professors in a Higher Education Institution on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This article analyses the use and acceptance of technologies by professors in the teaching and learning context in a higher education institution. In the empirical study, a questionnaire based on the technology acceptance model was applied. The results indicated that the most used technologies are Moodle, Facebook and YouTube and it was concluded that in general, those technologies are well accepted. Few statistically significant differences between respondents' gender, scientific areas or ages were found, revealing that the use of those technologies is already widespread in the studied institution. Results also showed that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are two important determinants of Moodle acceptance, and that the majority of respondents did not know the MOOC concept. This article is valuable for researchers in the area and for professors that want to implement the use technologies in the teaching and learning context.

Related Content

Hussein Fakhry, Mathew Nicho, Emad Bataineh, Shini Girja. © 2024. 25 pages.
Maha Al-Freih, Heather Robinson. © 2024. 15 pages.
I-Jui Lee, Shyh-Rong Wang. © 2024. 23 pages.
Rajanikanth Aluvalu, Uma Maheswari V., G.R. Anil, Mahesh S. Raisinghani. © 2024. 13 pages.
Rajashree Jain, Minal Abhyankar, Prasad Kantipudi MVV, Rajanikanth Aluvalu, Mahesh S. Raisinghani. © 2024. 12 pages.
Sandy I. Ching Wang, Eric Zhi Feng Liu. © 2024. 15 pages.
. © 2024.
Body Bottom