IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Optimization of Fractal Dimension of Turned AISI 1040 Steel Surface Considering Different Cutting Conditions: Fractal Dimension of Turned Steel Surface

Optimization of Fractal Dimension of Turned AISI 1040 Steel Surface Considering Different Cutting Conditions: Fractal Dimension of Turned Steel Surface
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Arkadeb Mukhopadhyay (Heritage Institute of Technology, Kolkata, India), Manik Barman (Heritage Institute of Technology, Kolkata, India)and Prasanta Sahoo (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India)
Copyright: 2019
Volume: 7
Issue: 2
Pages: 15
Source title: International Journal of Surface Engineering and Interdisciplinary Materials Science (IJSEIMS)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: J. Paulo Davim (University of Aveiro, Portugal)
DOI: 10.4018/IJSEIMS.2019070102

Purchase


Abstract

The present work examines the effect of turning process parameters, namely depth of cut and feed rate on the fractal dimension of AISI 1040 steel. Machined surfaces have been characterized using fractal dimensions. Apart from the aforesaid conventional turning parameters, cutting condition has been also considered as a design variable. Three cutting conditions have been considered, e.g. dry, water lubricated, and commercially available water-soluble emulsion lubricated condition. The depth of cut and feed rate has been also been varied at three levels. Experiments were performed following Taguchi's L9 orthogonal array. The optimal setting of process parameters has been achieved through the use of Taguchi's quality loss function represented by a signal-to-noise ratio. The optimal condition predicted from Taguchi's analysis is a 0.4 mm depth of cut, a 0.07 mm/rev feed rate and a water-based emulsion cutting environment. The results obtained for fractal dimensions has been also compared with the more conventional roughness parameter centre line average roughness which is dependent on instrument resolution.

Related Content

Meng-Ting Chiang, Pei-Ing Lee, Ang-Ying Lin, Tung-Han Chuang. © 2024. 11 pages.
Jean Claude Mallia, Anthea Agius Anastasi, Sophie Marie Briffa. © 2023. 20 pages.
Manik Barman, Tapan Kumar Barman, Prasanta Sahoo. © 2022. 26 pages.
Vinod Kumar V. Meti, G. U. Raju, I. G. Siddhalingeshwar, Vinayak Neelakanth Gaitonde. © 2022. 13 pages.
Sandeep Kumar Khatkar, Rajeev Verma, Suman Kant, Narendra Mohan Suri. © 2022. 19 pages.
Jason van Dyke, Michel Nganbe. © 2022. 19 pages.
Basant Lal, Abhijit Dey, Mohamamd Farooq Wani. © 2022. 12 pages.
Body Bottom