IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Evolution of Literature on Scientometric Indicators

Evolution of Literature on Scientometric Indicators
View Sample PDF
Copyright: 2019
Pages: 17
Source title: Scholarly Content and Its Evolution by Scientometric Indicators: Emerging Research and Opportunities
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Zahid Ashraf Wani (University of Kashmir, India)and Tazeem Zainab (University of Kashmir, India)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5945-0.ch003

Purchase

View Evolution of Literature on Scientometric Indicators on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

An unbiased and reasonable research evaluation should reflect the diversity and impact of research productivity. The evaluation of scientific research is essential to determine its achievement, reputation, growth, and progress of an individual or an institution. In this context, production and quality of scholarly content offer a strong foundation for its rational evaluation. The citations along with the number of scientific publications are predominantly used to evaluate research content. The use of scientometric indicators is of great use in the measurement and evaluation of the scientific research output, but at the same instant, it requires a great carefulness in use.

Related Content

Tutita M. Casa, Fabiana Cardetti, Madelyn W. Colonnese. © 2024. 14 pages.
R. Alex Smith, Madeline Day Price, Tessa L. Arsenault, Sarah R. Powell, Erin Smith, Michael Hebert. © 2024. 19 pages.
Marta T. Magiera, Mohammad Al-younes. © 2024. 27 pages.
Christopher Dennis Nazelli, S. Asli Özgün-Koca, Deborah Zopf. © 2024. 31 pages.
Ethan P. Smith. © 2024. 22 pages.
James P. Bywater, Sarah Lilly, Jennifer L. Chiu. © 2024. 20 pages.
Ian Jones, Jodie Hunter. © 2024. 20 pages.
Body Bottom