IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

MCEQLS Approach in Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Quality of Learning Repositories

MCEQLS Approach in Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Quality of Learning Repositories
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Eugenijus Kurilovas (Vilnius University, Lithuania & Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania)
Copyright: 2013
Pages: 22
Source title: Innovations in XML Applications and Metadata Management: Advancing Technologies
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): José Carlos Ramalho (Universidade do Minho, Portugal), Alberto Simões (Universidade do Minho, Portugal)and Ricardo Queirós (CRACS & INESC-Porto LA, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Portugal)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2669-0.ch006

Purchase

View MCEQLS Approach in Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Quality of Learning Repositories on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the quality of XML learning object repositories. Special attention is paid to the models and methods to evaluate the quality of learning repositories. Multiple criteria decision analysis and optimization methods are explored to be applied for evaluating the quality of learning repositories. This chapter also presents the results of several large-scale projects co-funded by EU research programs that have been implemented in the area of learning repositories. Learning repositories’ technological quality model (system of criteria) and novel comprehensive model for evaluating the quality of user interfaces of learning repositories are presented in more detail. The general MCEQLS (Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Learning Software) approach is presented in this chapter. It is shown that the MCEQLS approach is suitable for evaluating the quality of learning repositories. The author believes that research results presented in the chapter will be useful for all educational stakeholder groups interested in developing learning repositories.

Related Content

Ruizhe Ma, Azim Ahmadzadeh, Soukaina Filali Boubrahimi, Rafal A Angryk. © 2019. 19 pages.
Zhen Hua Liu. © 2019. 25 pages.
Lubna Irshad, Zongmin Ma, Li Yan. © 2019. 25 pages.
Hao Jiang, Ahmed Bouabdallah. © 2019. 22 pages.
Gbéboumé Crédo Charles Adjallah-Kondo, Zongmin Ma. © 2019. 22 pages.
Safa Brahmia, Zouhaier Brahmia, Fabio Grandi, Rafik Bouaziz. © 2019. 20 pages.
Zhangbing Hu, Li Yan. © 2019. 20 pages.
Body Bottom