IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Strategic Alignment for Business Value Creation

Strategic Alignment for Business Value Creation
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Eng K. Chew (University of Technology, Australia)and Petter Gottschalk (Norwegian School of Management, Norway)
Copyright: 2009
Pages: 36
Source title: Information Technology Strategy and Management: Best Practices
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Eng K. Chew (University of Technology, Sydney, Australia)and Petter Gottschalk (Norwegian School of Management, Norway)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-802-4.ch005

Purchase

View Strategic Alignment for Business Value Creation on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Chapter IV defines the macromodel for achieving business/IT alignment. This chapter defines the detailed methodology for each step of the IT strategy process. First, the business strategy process must be methodical and able to clearly show the linkage between corporate strategic intents and the respective specific business functional plans for realizing the intents. For example, for a specific productivity goal defined for the corporation, the respective initiatives planned for sales and marketing, and those for supply chain management must be clearly linked and explicitly correlated in a “cause-and-effect” manner. A good method invented by Norton and Kaplan called strategy map is an effective tool for this purpose. This chapter reviews the basic principles of IT strategy. It briefly discusses various models used to analyze or describe disparate parts of strategic alignment. These strategic alignment models are contrasted with our end-to-end alignment model for defining and executing business-aligned IT strategy. It shows that our model has integrated all the individual disparate alignment elements proposed by these models. Further, it shows our model has addressed some key requirements which have either not been considered or only partially considered by some of these models. The main strengths of our model compared to previous work are twofold: (a) it addresses all alignment elements in an integrated fashion to make them meaningful and useful for practitioners; and (b) it addresses the full life cycle of strategic alignment from direction setting to strategic outcome monitoring and ongoing feedback loop for self-adjusted alignment (aided by architecture principles and IT governance).

Related Content

Robert Casal, Raghvendra Singh, Daniel Della Posta, James Quinn. © 2023. 24 pages.
Nikitha Agnew, Manish Gupta, Raj Sharman. © 2023. 43 pages.
Ajeethra Balamurugan, Harshitha Anand Shetty, Karthikeyan Muthumani Sengunthar, Manish Gupta. © 2023. 27 pages.
Harshada Dayasagar Samant, Raghvendra Singh. © 2023. 31 pages.
Raghvendra Singh. © 2023. 21 pages.
Prabhat Kumar, Othniel Lambert, Sivajit Sreekumar, Mukesh Ravi Bhatia, Akash Garg. © 2023. 34 pages.
Sushmita Podugu, Vamsi Krishna Rayapureddi, Manish Gupta. © 2023. 30 pages.
Body Bottom