IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

The Limitations of Traditional Non-Digital Occlusal Indicators When Compared to the T-Scan Computerized Occlusal Analysis Technology

The Limitations of Traditional Non-Digital Occlusal Indicators When Compared to the T-Scan Computerized Occlusal Analysis Technology
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Sarah Qadeer, BDS, MSD (Thammasat University, Rangsit Campus, Thailand)
Copyright: 2015
Pages: 29
Source title: Handbook of Research on Computerized Occlusal Analysis Technology Applications in Dental Medicine
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Robert B. Kerstein, DMD (Former clinical professor at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, USA & Private Dental Practice Limited to Prosthodontics and Computerized Occlusal Analysis, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-6587-3.ch002

Purchase


Abstract

The traditional occlusal indicators used in dental practice are articulation papers, shim-stock foils, elastomeric impression materials, and occlusal wax strips. These static dental materials have been widely believed to have occlusal force descriptive capability. However, modern material studies are challenging the widespread belief that occlusal indicator materials can measure differing occlusal force levels. This chapter evaluates the force reporting limitations of these static occlusal indicators and discusses how clinicians subjectively interpret their appearance characteristics to determine differing occlusal force levels. This chapter then compares these non-digital occlusal indicators to computerized occlusal analysis technology that records and displays precise, quantifiable, relative occlusal force variances and occlusal contact timing sequences. This digital data aids the clinician in making a more accurate occlusal analysis and can guide the clinician in the correction of occlusal contact force and timing abnormalities, thereby eliminating the subjectivity that is inherent in traditional occlusal indicator use.

Related Content

Amy Moy. © 2022. 19 pages.
Kristen L. Kerber. © 2022. 11 pages.
Kristen L. Kerber. © 2022. 12 pages.
Gayathri Srinivasan. © 2022. 23 pages.
Jacky K. W. Kong. © 2022. 19 pages.
Iason Mantagos. © 2022. 11 pages.
M. H. Esther Han. © 2022. 29 pages.
Body Bottom