The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
The Use of Developmental Psychology in Ethics: Beyond Kohlberg and Seligman?
Abstract
This chapter argues that a developmental psychology based in a wider notion of reason and ultimate flourishing can employ both duty and virtue in the service of the common good. It identifies several important differences between cognitive structuralism and virtue-based approaches concerning the pre-empirical priority paid to either duty or virtue in moral development. It brings to light several challenges concerning the use of developmental psychology in ethics: (1) a weakness in schools of cognitive structuralism, such as that of Lawrence Kohlberg, inasmuch as they do not move beyond the theory of stages and structures that focus only on the cognitive judgment of justice and on duty; (2) a weakness in developmental virtue approaches, such as that of Martin Seligman, inasmuch as they do not employ moral content in the operative notions of virtues and values. This article concludes that a heartier notion of developmental psychology and normative ethics will need to recognize the interrelated nature of ethical acts (moral agency), ethical agents (moral character), and ethical norms (duties and law). Such an integrated approach must also attend to the input that diverse philosophical and religious presuppositions make toward understanding the place of developmental psychology in the practice of ethics.
Related Content
N. L. Swathi, Achukutla Kumar.
© 2024.
17 pages.
|
Gurwinder Singh, Anshika Thakur.
© 2024.
21 pages.
|
Ashok Singh Gaur, Hari Om Sharan, Rajeev Kumar.
© 2024.
16 pages.
|
Sabyasachi Pramanik.
© 2024.
17 pages.
|
Geetha Manoharan, Abdul Razak, C. V. Guru Rao, Sunitha Purushottam Ashtikar, M. Nivedha.
© 2024.
28 pages.
|
Roop Kamal, Manpreet Kaur, Jaspreet Kaur, Shivani Malhan.
© 2024.
10 pages.
|
Anu Sharma.
© 2024.
8 pages.
|
|
|