IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

A Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Algorithms for Data Classification Using KEEL Tool

A Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Algorithms for Data Classification Using KEEL Tool
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Amrit Pal Singh (Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, India), Chetna Gupta (Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, India), Rashpal Singh (Citi, Canada)and Nandini Singh (Nucleus Software, India)
Copyright: 2021
Volume: 12
Issue: 1
Pages: 12
Source title: International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research (IJSIR)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yuhui Shi (Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech), China)
DOI: 10.4018/IJSIR.2021010102

Purchase

View A Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Algorithms for Data Classification Using KEEL Tool on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Evolutionary algorithms are inspired by the biological model of evolution and natural selection and are used to solve computationally hard problems, also known as NP-hard problems. The main motive to use these algorithms is their robust and adaptive nature to provide best search techniques for complex problems. This paper presents a comparative analysis of classification of algorithm's family instead of algorithms comparison using KEEL tool. This work compares SSMA-C, DROP3PSO-C, FURIA-C, GFS-MaxLogitBoost-Cand CPSO-C algorithms. Further, these selected evolutionary algorithms are compared against two statistical classifiers using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Friedman test on following datasets—bupa, ecoli, glass, haberman, iris, monks, vehicle, and wine—to calculate classification efficiencies of these algorithms. Experimental results reveal some differences among these algorithms. Visualization module in the model has been used to give overall results as a summary while statistical test using Clas-Wilcoxin-ST compared the algorithms in a pair-wise fashion to conclude experimental findings.

Related Content

Fan Liu. © 2024. 21 pages.
Kai Zhang, Zi Tang. © 2024. 21 pages.
. © 2024.
Jing Liu, Shoubao Su, Haifeng Guo, Yuhua Lu, Yuexia Chen. © 2024. 11 pages.
Fazli Wahid, Rozaida Ghazali, Lokman Hakim Ismail, Ali M. Algarwi Aseere. © 2023. 13 pages.
Yifu Chen, Jun Li, Lin Zhang. © 2023. 31 pages.
Jatin Soni, Kuntal Bhattacharjee. © 2023. 15 pages.
Body Bottom