The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Evaluation of Multi-Peer and Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Brunei Case Study
Abstract
This article presents an evaluation of the use of peer and self-assessment as part of the learning process in a public speaking assessment coursework, with students from two departments taking part. Students were assessed by themselves, their peers and the lecturer using an online platform, Google forms, utilizing a set of rubrics. The marks were compared between markers to identify similarities and differences. After the process, student feedback on the experience was obtained using a questionnaire utilizing the Likert seven point scale to rate different questions. Analysis of the marks awarded found that whilst there might be correlations between different markers (i.e. peer – self) for marks on certain subsections of the work, there was no overall correlation between marks. Student perceptions to the exercise indicated that the use of rubrics was well received; students considered it a fair assessment method and it provided information on how to perform well in the assessment.
Related Content
Amy E. Heath, Carrie Barrett.
© 2024.
15 pages.
|
Qian Liu.
© 2024.
16 pages.
|
Jennifer L. Doherty-Restrepo, Katherine Perez, Michael Creeden, Bridgette Cram, McLudmer Charite.
© 2023.
14 pages.
|
George Hanshaw, Jacob Hanshaw.
© 2023.
21 pages.
|
Gregory J. Krivacek.
© 2023.
17 pages.
|
Steve Reifenberg.
© 2023.
10 pages.
|
Lubna Ali, Colette Knight, Ulrik Schroeder.
© 2022.
14 pages.
|
|
|