Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Powerpoint Presentation Evaluation Based on Aggregation of Quality Criteria

Powerpoint Presentation Evaluation Based on Aggregation of Quality Criteria
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Sergey Sakulin (Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Russia), Alexander Alfimtsev (Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Russia) and Dmitry Sokolov (Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Russia)
Copyright: 2021
Volume: 17
Issue: 1
Pages: 18
Source title: International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: David D. Carbonara (Duquesne University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/IJICTE.2021010101


View Powerpoint Presentation Evaluation Based on Aggregation of Quality Criteria on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.


Today, there is no consensus about proper timing and conditions for integration of PowerPoint presentations into the educational process. But the model-based evaluation can make a decision-making process easier when it comes to using presentations. The purpose of this study is to build a formal model to evaluate presentations. In order to build a formal model, the authors suggest employing hierarchical structure consisting of aggregation operators, such as the weighted averaging operator, minimum operator, and fuzzy Choquet integral. The proposed formal model shows experts' knowledge of the interdependencies between the criteria. The experiment described in the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of such a model as it allows to formalize expert preferences gradually, which may include interdependencies between the quality criteria of a presentation. Thus, this model will allow to store, analyze, and compare presentations properties that are necessary for their successful application.

Related Content

Khaleel Bader Bataineh, Mohammed Salem Atoum, Lama Ahmad Alsmadi, May Shikhali. © 2021. 11 pages.
Chantyclaire Tiba, Janet Lesley Condy. © 2021. 13 pages.
Zexuan Chen, Jianli Jiao, Kexin Hu. © 2021. 16 pages.
Sangeeta Sharma, Arpan Bumb. © 2021. 23 pages.
Michael W. Marek, Chiou Sheng Chew, Wen-chi Vivian Wu. © 2021. 21 pages.
Sergey Sakulin, Alexander Alfimtsev, Dmitry Sokolov. © 2021. 18 pages.
Nabil Hasan Al-Kumaim, Siti Hasnah Hassan, Muhammad Salman Shabbir, Abdulwahab Ali Almazroi, Hussein Mohammed Abu Al-Rejal. © 2021. 23 pages.
Body Bottom