IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

A Ranking Framework for Higher Education Institutions: A Students' Perspective

A Ranking Framework for Higher Education Institutions: A Students' Perspective
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Andre Paul Calitz (Nelson Mandela University, South Africa), Margaret Diane Cullen (Nelson Mandela University, South Africa)and Teresia Watiri Kanyutu (Nelson Mandela University, South Africa)
Copyright: 2021
Pages: 22
Source title: University-Industry Collaboration Strategies in the Digital Era
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Durmuş Günay (Maltepe University, Turkey), Tuncer Asunakutlu (Izmir Bakircay University, Turkey)and Orkun Yildiz (Izmir Democracy University, Turkey)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-3901-9.ch003

Purchase

View A Ranking Framework for Higher Education Institutions: A Students' Perspective on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

The use of league tables and rankings (LTRs) as a tool to rank or measure the performance of higher education institutions (HEIs) has grown in popularity. Research indicates that these ranking criteria are often discussed from the standpoint of governments, the HEI management, and the ranking institutions producing these LTR publications. The opinions of the students on the suitable ranking criteria used by ranking institutions are generally omitted. This chapter investigates the applicable criteria for ranking HEIs in South Africa, from the perspective of students. A survey was conducted to determine the most relevant university ranking criteria considered by university students. The results indicate that the students perceive resources and infrastructure, accreditation, international orientation, research output, faculty quality, and teaching and learning as the most relevant criteria for ranking HEIs. Managerial recommendations are provided for HEIs to address the ranking criteria rated important by students.

Related Content

Gregory Peters, RoLesia Holman, Candice Bocala. © 2024. 26 pages.
Michaelann Kelley, Gayle A. Curtis, Cheryl J. Craig. © 2024. 23 pages.
Ayanna D. Perry, Joyce Lin. © 2024. 21 pages.
Jeanie M. Phillips, Michael S. Martin. © 2024. 23 pages.
Nuria Alonso Garcia, Sarah Elizabeth Campbell. © 2024. 26 pages.
Mohamad Zreik. © 2024. 21 pages.
Kari Thierer, Kim Carter. © 2024. 14 pages.
Body Bottom