IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Argumentation with Wigmore Charts and Computing

Argumentation with Wigmore Charts and Computing
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Ephraim Nissan (Goldsmiths College, University of London, UK)
Copyright: 2007
Pages: 6
Source title: Encyclopedia of Information Ethics and Security
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Marian Quigley (Monash University, Australia)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-987-8.ch006

Purchase

View Argumentation with Wigmore Charts and Computing on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

In the previous article, “Argumentation and Computing,” we provided an overview as well as some operational knowledge of this important, emerging intersection of argumentation (paramount as it is in philosophy, ethics, and law) and computational models or computer tools. In the present short entry, instead, we focus on providing operational knowledge about a particular graphical notation for argumentation, Wigmore Charts, quite valuable for legal scholars, yet which have deservedly come within the notice of computer scientists. Once you learn how to use Wigmore Charts, they may well be the handiest notation around. This is why we find it important to teach how to use them.

Related Content

Chaymaâ Boutahiri, Ayoub Nouaiti, Aziz Bouazi, Abdallah Marhraoui Hsaini. © 2024. 14 pages.
Imane Cheikh, Khaoula Oulidi Omali, Mohammed Nabil Kabbaj, Mohammed Benbrahim. © 2024. 30 pages.
Tahiri Omar, Herrou Brahim, Sekkat Souhail, Khadiri Hassan. © 2024. 19 pages.
Sekkat Souhail, Ibtissam El Hassani, Anass Cherrafi. © 2024. 14 pages.
Meryeme Bououchma, Brahim Herrou. © 2024. 14 pages.
Touria Jdid, Idriss Chana, Aziz Bouazi, Mohammed Nabil Kabbaj, Mohammed Benbrahim. © 2024. 16 pages.
Houda Bentarki, Abdelkader Makhoute, Tőkési Karoly. © 2024. 10 pages.
Body Bottom