IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Barriers to and Strategies for Faculty Integration of IT

Barriers to and Strategies for Faculty Integration of IT
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Thomas M. Brinthaupt (Middle Tennessee State University, USA), Maria A. Clayton (Middle Tennessee State University, USA)and Barbara J. Draude (Middle Tennessee State University, USA)
Copyright: 2011
Pages: 9
Source title: Instructional Design: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60960-503-2.ch507

Purchase

View Barriers to and Strategies for Faculty Integration of IT on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

At most institutions of higher education, faculty members wear many “hats.” Among other responsibilities, they are expected to teach, conduct research, and participate in institutional and public service. Within the teaching realm, faculty members have always had multiple responsibilities. For example, in addition to being content experts, they may need to become course design, assessment, communication, community or interaction experts. Instructors can be described as architects, consultants, resources, reviewers, and role models (Oblinger & Hawkins, 2006). It is primarily (though not exclusively) in the teaching realm where instructional technology (IT) is relevant. The more that faculty utilize IT, the more the non-content aspects of teaching become salient. Depending on level of faculty expertise, asking them to increase the time and effort they put into their teaching might reduce the time and effort they can devote to research, service, and other institutional requirements and responsibilities. Why should they, especially if there is very little acknowledgment or tenure/promotion credit given for incorporating IT into their teaching? This is, in part, why many faculty members may have to be dragged “kicking and screaming” into using these technologies.

Related Content

Jessica A. Manzone, Julia L. Nyberg. © 2024. 22 pages.
Angela Marie Novak, Brittany N. Anderson. © 2024. 27 pages.
Lucy K. Hunt, Erin Yoshida-Ehrmann. © 2024. 20 pages.
Angela Marie Novak. © 2024. 36 pages.
Lynne F. Henwood. © 2024. 19 pages.
Sean Doyle. © 2024. 20 pages.
Nyree D. Clark. © 2024. 26 pages.
Body Bottom