IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Cognitive Mapping and GIS for Community-Based Resource Identification

Cognitive Mapping and GIS for Community-Based Resource Identification
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Lyn Kathlene (Colorado State University, USA)
Copyright: 2013
Pages: 18
Source title: Geographic Information Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2038-4.ch042

Purchase

View Cognitive Mapping and GIS for Community-Based Resource Identification on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This chapter describes and analyzes the effectiveness of two methodological techniques, cognitive mapping and geographical information systems (GIS), for identifying social service resources. It also examines the processes used to integrate hand-drawn map information into geocoded data points and provides recommendations for improving efficiency and precision. As a first step to integrate Jefferson County social service delivery into community-based child welfare “systems of care” (SOC), both formal and informal services had to be identified. Cognitive mapping, a process by which participants draw visual representations of geographical areas, was conducted with 247 participants in Jefferson County, Colorado. Over 3,500 resources were identified and entered into a GIS to analyze the availability, capacity, and distribution of social services in the county and within communities. Identification of community resources via cognitive mapping and GIS analysis provide: (1) a comprehensive database of existing services; (2) a basis to build communication networks and cooperation among government and community providers; (3) the ability to create an efficient system that avoids duplication of efforts; (4) an understanding of the geographical distribution of resources; (5) the identification of resources lacking in the county and specific communities; and (6) knowledge differences among diverse participant groups.

Related Content

Salwa Saidi, Anis Ghattassi, Samar Zaggouri, Ahmed Ezzine. © 2021. 19 pages.
Mehmet Sevkli, Abdullah S. Karaman, Yusuf Ziya Unal, Muheeb Babajide Kotun. © 2021. 29 pages.
Soumaya Elhosni, Sami Faiz. © 2021. 13 pages.
Symphorien Monsia, Sami Faiz. © 2021. 20 pages.
Sana Rekik. © 2021. 9 pages.
Oumayma Bounouh, Houcine Essid, Imed Riadh Farah. © 2021. 14 pages.
Mustapha Mimouni, Nabil Ben Khatra, Amjed Hadj Tayeb, Sami Faiz. © 2021. 18 pages.
Body Bottom