IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Comparison of Video Coding Standards Used in Mobile Applications

Comparison of Video Coding Standards Used in Mobile Applications
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Goran Gvozden (RTL Televizija, Croatia), Mislav Grgic (University of Zagreb, Croatia), Sonja Grgic (University of Zagreb, Croatia) and Miran Gosta (Croatian Telecommunication Agency, Croatia)
Copyright: 2009
Pages: 17
Source title: Handbook of Research on Mobile Multimedia, Second Edition
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Ismail Khalil (Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-046-2.ch010

Purchase

View Comparison of Video Coding Standards Used in Mobile Applications on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This chapter gives description and comparison of video coding standards currently used in bandwidth limited mobile communications emphasizing at the same time the importance of coding efficiency and robustness, particularly for video applications. Due to its exceptional efficiency and performance a number of mobile service operators recognized and embraced relatively new H.264/AVC compression method. Utilization of this efficient compression method in the bandwidth limited and distortion prone mobile environment enables and provides transport of high quality video on low data rates. In order to demonstrate these abilities a comparison of H.264/AVC relative to MPEG-4 SP and H.263 method is presented. Comparison is performed using objective video quality assessment methods accompanied with description of different issues related to video quality measurement and its implication on coding process. Finally, comparison showed and confirmed great efficiency and performance possibilities, which will make H.264/AVC the ubiquitous coding technique of multimedia world in time to come.

Related Content

K. Jairam Naik, Annukriti Soni. © 2021. 18 pages.
Randhir Kumar, Rakesh Tripathi. © 2021. 22 pages.
Yogesh Kumar Gupta. © 2021. 38 pages.
Kamel H. Rahouma, Ayman A. Ali. © 2021. 34 pages.
Muni Sekhar Velpuru. © 2021. 19 pages.
Vijayakumari B.. © 2021. 24 pages.
Neetu Faujdar, Anant Joshi. © 2021. 41 pages.
Body Bottom