IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Constructivism in Education: Interpretations and Criticisms from Science Education

Constructivism in Education: Interpretations and Criticisms from Science Education
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Keith S. Taber (University of Cambridge, UK)
Copyright: 2016
Pages: 29
Source title: Handbook of Research on Applied Learning Theory and Design in Modern Education
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Elena A. Railean (European University of Moldova, Moldova), Gabriela Walker (University of South Dakota, USA), Atilla Elçi (Hasan Kalyoncu University, Turkey)and Liz Jackson (University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9634-1.ch006

Purchase

View Constructivism in Education: Interpretations and Criticisms from Science Education on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Constructivism has been widely adopted as a referent for research, curriculum development and recommended pedagogy in education. This chapter considers key issues relating to the adoption of constructivist thinking in education which have arisen within the field of science education. Constructivism has been mooted as a dominant paradigm in science education, where it has informed a major research programme over some decades. However, the application of constructivist ideas in science education has also been subject to a range of critiques. This chapter gives an outline of the developing influence of constructivism in science education, and the common understandings of the term in relation to science teaching and learning; it reports on the main areas where the influence of constructivist thinking has been heavily criticised, and discusses how these criticisms are countered within the research programme; it considers some major directions for research within the research programme; and it evaluates the level of influence of constructivism in contemporary science education practice.

Related Content

Jessica A. Manzone, Julia L. Nyberg. © 2024. 22 pages.
Angela Marie Novak, Brittany N. Anderson. © 2024. 27 pages.
Lucy K. Hunt, Erin Yoshida-Ehrmann. © 2024. 20 pages.
Angela Marie Novak. © 2024. 36 pages.
Lynne F. Henwood. © 2024. 19 pages.
Sean Doyle. © 2024. 20 pages.
Nyree D. Clark. © 2024. 26 pages.
Body Bottom