IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Culture Aware M-Learning Classification Framework for African Countries

Culture Aware M-Learning Classification Framework for African Countries
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Simon Nyaga Mwendia (KCA University, Kenya), Peter Waiganjo Wagacha (University of Nairobi, Kenya)and Robert Oboko (University of Nairobi, Kenya)
Copyright: 2016
Pages: 15
Source title: Human-Computer Interaction: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8789-9.ch021

Purchase

View Culture Aware M-Learning Classification Framework for African Countries on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

African countries are currently experiencing proliferation of mobile phone subscriptions but no prevalence of personal computers or electricity (Parker, 2011). It is estimated that, by the end of 2015 in Sub-Saharan Africa, the percentage of people with mobile network access will surpass that of access to electricity in homes (Rao, 2011). This phenomenon is also experienced in learning institutions, particularly universities, where almost every student owns a mobile phone (Kashorda & Waema, 2009). Although there is a great potential for Mobile Learning (M-Learning) in education, the formal integration of M-Learning in the education systems is in its infancy since there is limited number of M-Learning projects in the region. This is in contrast with the rapid increase and integration of mobile phones in the daily lives of the population in the region (Isaacs, 2012). According to Olaniran (2009), online learning needs to be culturally aware and investigate the dimensions of cultural variability as well as its influence on learning within global education. In an attempt to address this need, this chapter focuses on the African region in describing dimensions of cultural variability and proposes four categories for M-Learning projects as well as their influences on dimensions of cultural variability.

Related Content

Rekha Mewafarosh, Shivani Agarwal, Deeksha Dwivedi. © 2024. 15 pages.
Rishi Prakash Shukla. © 2024. 9 pages.
Priya Makhija, Megha Kukreja, R. Thanga Kumar. © 2024. 11 pages.
Balraj Verma, Niti Chatterji. © 2024. 18 pages.
Peterson K. Ozili. © 2024. 17 pages.
Animesh Kumar Sharma, Rahul Sharma. © 2024. 20 pages.
Mohammad Badruddoza Talukder, Firoj Kabir, Fahmida Kaiser, Farhana Yeasmin Lina. © 2024. 20 pages.
Body Bottom