IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Digital "Evidence" is Often Evidence of Nothing

Digital "Evidence" is Often Evidence of Nothing
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Michael A. Caloyannides (Mitretek Systems Inc., USA)
Copyright: 2006
Pages: 6
Source title: Digital Crime and Forensic Science in Cyberspace
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Panagiotis Kanellis (Information Society S.A., Greece), Evangelos Kiountouzis (Athens University, Greece), Nicholas Kolokotronis (Universitiy of Peloponnese, Greece)and Drakoulis Martakos (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-872-7.ch015

Purchase

View Digital "Evidence" is Often Evidence of Nothing on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Digital data increasingly presented in courts as evidence is mistakenly viewed by judges and juries as inherently unalterable. In fact, digital data can be very easily altered and it can be impossible for this falsification to be detected. A number of common ways are described whereby data in one’s computer can enter without the computer owner’s knowledge, let alone complicity. The same applies to all digital storage media, such as those used in digital cameras, digital “tape” recorders, digital divers’ computers, GPS “navigators”, and all other digital devices in common use today. It is important for judges and juries to be highly skeptical of any claims by prosecution that digital “evidence” proves anything at all.

Related Content

Hossam Nabil Elshenraki. © 2024. 23 pages.
Ibtesam Mohammed Alawadhi. © 2024. 9 pages.
Akashdeep Bhardwaj. © 2024. 33 pages.
John Blake. © 2024. 12 pages.
Wasswa Shafik. © 2024. 36 pages.
Amar Yasser El-Bably. © 2024. 12 pages.
Sameer Saharan, Shailja Singh, Ajay Kumar Bhandari, Bhuvnesh Yadav. © 2024. 23 pages.
Body Bottom