IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Dimensions of Student Satisfaction on Online Programs

Dimensions of Student Satisfaction on Online Programs
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Petek Askar (Hacettepe University, Turkey), Oktay Dönmez (Hacettepe University, Turkey), Gonca Kizilkaya (Hacettepe University, Turkey), Volkan Çevik (Hacettepe University, Turkey)and Kerem Gültekin (Hacettepe University, Turkey)
Copyright: 2009
Pages: 6
Source title: Encyclopedia of Distance Learning, Second Edition
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Patricia L. Rogers (Bemidji State University, USA), Gary A. Berg (California State University Channel Islands (Retired), USA), Judith V. Boettcher (Designing for Learning, USA), Caroline Howard (HC Consulting, USA), Lorraine Justice (Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)and Karen D. Schenk (K. D. Schenk and Associates Consulting, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-198-8.ch091

Purchase

View Dimensions of Student Satisfaction on Online Programs on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This research studies on the evaluation of online courses are usually conducted for investigating the differences between face-to-face and Web-based environments with respect to achievement. Most of the findings indicated “no significant difference” (Russell, 1999). However, only looking at achievement as a quality measure is reducing the complex phenomena into a single variable. Therefore, an analysis of the system with its components is needed. A study on students’ frustrations with a Web-based distance education course (Hara & Kling, 1999) showed that there were two foci of frustration among students in the course. The first focus was technological problems; students without access to technical support were especially frustrated. The second focus involved the course content and the instructor’s practices in managing communications with students. Students were frustrated because of a lack of immediate feedback from the instructor and ambiguous instructions on the Web and via e-mail.

Related Content

Sylvia Robertson. © 2023. 28 pages.
Dimitrios Stamovlasis, Charalampos Tsanidis. © 2023. 23 pages.
Ikram Chelliq, Lamya Anoir, Mohamed Erradi, Mohamed Khaldi. © 2023. 26 pages.
Vasiliki Ioakeimidou. © 2023. 27 pages.
Eleni Bonti. © 2023. 25 pages.
Lamya Anoir, Ikram Chelliq, Mohamed Erradi, Mohamed Khaldi. © 2023. 29 pages.
Shibu Puthalath, M. R. Mallaiah, Viswesh Sekhar. © 2023. 17 pages.
Body Bottom