The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Evaluation of Moodle, Canvas, Blackboard, and Open EdX
|
Author(s): Yunus Emre Öztürk (EdTech Center, Ubion Co. Ltd., South Korea)and İsmail Gürler (Agri Ibrahim Cecen University, Turkey)
Copyright: 2020
Pages: 20
Source title:
ICT-Based Assessment, Methods, and Programs in Tertiary Education
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Serpil Meri Yilan (Agri Ibrahim Cecen University, Turkey)and Kasim Koruyan (King Saud University, Saudi Arabia)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-3062-7.ch018
Purchase
|
Abstract
The digital world abolishing all the limitations to reach knowledge and removing the borders of the countries and even continents serves as a facilitator for everyone who wants to learn and reach knowledge. The growing demand for knowledge throughout the world also increases the need for a variety of courses from highly appreciated institutions and instructors in the most effective educational methods and techniques. Therefore, deciding which substructure or platform to be chosen by both enterprises to make a profit and learners to acquire knowledge in the most suitable way is becoming a more challenging issue for both counterparts of teaching and learning. In order to make this selection process easy, based on the document analysis method, this chapter presents an evaluative report on globally popular e-learning platforms including Canvas, Blackboard, Moodle, and Open edX in terms of their market share, user interface, feature strengths and weaknesses, and it reaches a conclusion by comparing and contrasting their differences and similarities.
Related Content
Sarah H. Jarvie, Cara L. Metz.
© 2024.
15 pages.
|
Carrie Grimes, Whitney Walters-Sachs.
© 2024.
39 pages.
|
Crystal Ann Brashear.
© 2024.
19 pages.
|
Rosina E. Mete, Alyssa Weiss.
© 2024.
16 pages.
|
Kim Cowan, William G. Davis, Stephanie Stubbs.
© 2024.
21 pages.
|
Selin Philip, Shalini Mathew.
© 2024.
17 pages.
|
Ariel Harrison.
© 2024.
21 pages.
|
|
|