The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Implications of Mixing Methods: Balancing Paradigmatic and Validation Distinctives
Abstract
Much like a jigsaw puzzle box top guides one in how to connect the pieces, a research paradigm operates as a conscious or subconscious influence in conducting a research project. The promise—and challenge—of mixed methods research is that it involves the use of two box tops, and this chapter discusses the subsequent implications on the researcher. The first effect is through the need to balance the paradigmatic distinctives, requiring the researcher to identify one of four broad ways to address the paradigm divide at the heart of qualitative and quantitative research. The second effect is through the need to balance the validation distinctives. Making research credible is an essential component of any study, and the issues magnify given the stark differences between qualitative and quantitative validity orientations. Both implications reveal the level of sophistication required for the researcher when conducting a mixed methods project.
Related Content
Tutita M. Casa, Fabiana Cardetti, Madelyn W. Colonnese.
© 2024.
14 pages.
|
R. Alex Smith, Madeline Day Price, Tessa L. Arsenault, Sarah R. Powell, Erin Smith, Michael Hebert.
© 2024.
19 pages.
|
Marta T. Magiera, Mohammad Al-younes.
© 2024.
27 pages.
|
Christopher Dennis Nazelli, S. Asli Özgün-Koca, Deborah Zopf.
© 2024.
31 pages.
|
Ethan P. Smith.
© 2024.
22 pages.
|
James P. Bywater, Sarah Lilly, Jennifer L. Chiu.
© 2024.
20 pages.
|
Ian Jones, Jodie Hunter.
© 2024.
20 pages.
|
|
|