IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Incorporating a Self-Directed Learning Pedagogy in the Computing Classroom: Problem-Based Learning as a Means to Improving Software Engineering Learning Outcomes

Incorporating a Self-Directed Learning Pedagogy in the Computing Classroom: Problem-Based Learning as a Means to Improving Software Engineering Learning Outcomes
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Oisín Cawley (The National College of Ireland, Ireland), Stephan Weibelzahl (The National College of Ireland, Ireland), Ita Richardson (University of Limerick, Ireland)and Yvonne Delaney (University of Limerick, Ireland)
Copyright: 2014
Pages: 24
Source title: Overcoming Challenges in Software Engineering Education: Delivering Non-Technical Knowledge and Skills
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Liguo Yu (Indiana University South Bend, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-5800-4.ch018

Purchase


Abstract

With a focus on addressing the perceived skills gap in Software Engineering (SE) graduates, some educators have looked to employing alternative teaching and learning strategies in the classroom. One such pedagogy is Problem-Based Learning (PBL), an approach the authors have incorporated into the SE curriculum in two separate third-level institutions in Ireland, namely the University of Limerick (UL) and the National College of Ireland (NCI). PBL is an approach to teaching and learning which is quite different to the more typical “lecture” style found in most 3rd level institutions. PBL allows lecturers to meet educational and industry-specific objectives; however, while it has been used widely in Medical and Business schools, its use has not been so widespread with computing educators. PBL is not without its difficulties given that it requires significant changes in the role of the lecturer and the active participation of the students. Here, the authors present the approach taken to implement PBL into their respective programs. They present the pitfalls and obstacles that needed to be addressed, the levels of success that have been achieved so far, and briefly discuss some of the important aspects that Software Engineering lecturers should consider.

Related Content

John Robinson, Daniel Beneroso. © 2022. 19 pages.
Klaas Stek. © 2022. 30 pages.
Mira Kekkonen, Ville Isoherranen. © 2022. 19 pages.
Helder Gomes Costa, Frederico Henrichs Sheremetieff, Elaine Aparecida Araújo. © 2022. 20 pages.
Erik Teixeira Lopes, André Luiz Aquere. © 2022. 30 pages.
Ariana Araujo, Heidi Manninen. © 2022. 27 pages.
João Eduardo Teixeira Marinho, Inês Rafaela Martins Freitas, Isabelle Batista dos Santos Leão, Leonor Oliveira Carvalho Sousa Pacheco, Margarida Pires Gonçalves, Maria João Carvalho Castro, Pedro Duarte Marinho Silva, Rafael José Sousa Moreira. © 2022. 19 pages.
Body Bottom