IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Measuring the Efficiency of Free and Open Source Software Projects Using Data Envelopment Analysis

Measuring the Efficiency of Free and Open Source Software Projects Using Data Envelopment Analysis
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Stefan Koch (Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Austria)
Copyright: 2009
Pages: 15
Source title: Software Applications: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Pierre F. Tiako (Langston University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-060-8.ch173

Purchase

View Measuring the Efficiency of Free and Open Source Software Projects Using Data Envelopment Analysis on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

In this chapter, we propose for the first time a method to compare the efficiency of free and open source projects, based on the data envelopment analysis (DEA) methodology. DEA offers several advantages in this context, as it is a non-parametric optimization method without any need for the user to define any relations between different factors or a production function, can account for economies or diseconomies of scale, and is able to deal with multi-input, multi-output systems in which the factors have different scales. Using a data set of 43 large F/OS projects retrieved from SourceForge.net, we demonstrate the application of DEA, and show that DEA indeed is usable for comparing the efficiency of projects. We will also show additional analyses based on the results, exploring whether the inequality in work distribution within the projects, the licensing schem,e or the intended audience have an effect on their efficiency. As this is a first attempt at using this method for F/OS projects, several future research directions are possible. These include additional work on determining input and output factors, comparisons within application areas, and comparison to commercial or mixed-mode development projects.

Related Content

Babita Srivastava. © 2024. 21 pages.
Sakuntala Rao, Shalini Chandra, Dhrupad Mathur. © 2024. 27 pages.
Satya Sekhar Venkata Gudimetla, Naveen Tirumalaraju. © 2024. 24 pages.
Neeta Baporikar. © 2024. 23 pages.
Shankar Subramanian Subramanian, Amritha Subhayan Krishnan, Arumugam Seetharaman. © 2024. 35 pages.
Charu Banga, Farhan Ujager. © 2024. 24 pages.
Munir Ahmad. © 2024. 27 pages.
Body Bottom