IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Needle Insertion Force Modeling using Genetic Programming Polynomial Higher Order Neural Network

Needle Insertion Force Modeling using Genetic Programming Polynomial Higher Order Neural Network
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Mehdi Fallahnezhad (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway)and Hashem Yousefi (Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Iran)
Copyright: 2014
Pages: 19
Source title: Robotics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4607-0.ch031

Purchase

View Needle Insertion Force Modeling using Genetic Programming Polynomial Higher Order Neural Network on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Precise insertion of a medical needle as an end-effecter of a robotic or computer-aided system into biological tissue is an important issue and should be considered in different operations, such as brain biopsy, prostate brachytherapy, and percutaneous therapies. Proper understanding of the whole procedure leads to a better performance by an operator or system. In this chapter, the authors use a 0.98 mm diameter needle with a real-time recording of force, displacement, and velocity of needle through biological tissue during in-vitro insertions. Using constant velocity experiments from 5 mm/min up to 300 mm/min, the data set for the force-displacement graph of insertion was gathered. Tissue deformation with a small puncture and a constant velocity penetration are the two first phases in the needle insertion process. Direct effects of different parameters and their correlations during the process is being modeled using a polynomial neural network. The authors develop different networks in 2nd and 3rd order to model the two first phases of insertion separately. Modeling accuracies were 98% and 86% in phase 1 and 2, respectively.

Related Content

Rashmi Rani Samantaray, Zahira Tabassum, Abdul Azeez. © 2024. 32 pages.
Sanjana Prasad, Deepashree Rajendra Prasad. © 2024. 25 pages.
Deepak Varadam, Sahana P. Shankar, Aryan Bharadwaj, Tanvi Saxena, Sarthak Agrawal, Shraddha Dayananda. © 2024. 24 pages.
Tarun Kumar Vashishth, Vikas Sharma, Kewal Krishan Sharma, Bhupendra Kumar, Sachin Chaudhary, Rajneesh Panwar. © 2024. 29 pages.
Mrutyunjaya S. Hiremath, Rajashekhar C. Biradar. © 2024. 30 pages.
C. L. Chayalakshmi, Mahabaleshwar S. Kakkasageri, Rajani S. Pujar, Nayana Hegde. © 2024. 30 pages.
Amit Kumar Tyagi. © 2024. 29 pages.
Body Bottom