IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Performance of Negative Selection Algorithms in Patient Detection and Classification

Performance of Negative Selection Algorithms in Patient Detection and Classification
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Orhan Bölükbaş (Aksaray University, Turkey)and Harun Uğuz (Selcuk University, Turkey)
Copyright: 2018
Pages: 25
Source title: Nature-Inspired Intelligent Techniques for Solving Biomedical Engineering Problems
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Utku Kose (Suleyman Demirel University, Turkey), Gur Emre Guraksin (Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey)and Omer Deperlioglu (Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-4769-3.ch004

Purchase

View Performance of Negative Selection Algorithms in Patient Detection and Classification on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Artificial immune systems inspired by the natural immune system are used in problems such as classification, optimization, anomaly detection, and error detection. In these problems, clonal selection algorithm, artificial immune network algorithm, and negative selection algorithm are generally used. This chapter aims to solve the problem of correct identification and classification of patients using negative selection (NS) and variable detector negative selection (V-DET NS) algorithms. The authors examine the performance of NSA and V-DET NSA algorithms using three sets of medical data sets from Parkinson, carotid artery doppler, and epilepsy patients. According to the obtained results, NSA achieved 92.45%, 91.46%, and 92.21% detection accuracy and 92.46%, 93.40%, and 90.57% classification accuracy. V-DET NSA achieved 94.34%, 94.52%, and 91.51% classification accuracy and 94.23%, 94.40%, and 89.29% detection accuracy. As can be seen from these values, V-Det NSA yielded a better result. Artificial immune system emerges as an effective and promising system in terms of problem-solving performance.

Related Content

Utku Kose. © 2018. 26 pages.
Kamalanand Krishnamurthy, Mannar Jawahar Ponnuswamy. © 2018. 24 pages.
Omer Deperlioglu. © 2018. 27 pages.
Orhan Bölükbaş, Harun Uğuz. © 2018. 25 pages.
Aydın Çetin, Tuba Gökhan. © 2018. 27 pages.
Pandian Vasant. © 2018. 16 pages.
Huseyin Coskun, Tuncay Yigit. © 2018. 38 pages.
Body Bottom