The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Rubrics as an Assessment Tool in Distance Education
|
Author(s): Bonnie L. MacGregor (Bryant & Stratton College, USA)
Copyright: 2009
Pages: 6
Source title:
Encyclopedia of Distance Learning, Second Edition
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Patricia L. Rogers (Bemidji State University, USA), Gary A. Berg (California State University Channel Islands (Retired), USA), Judith V. Boettcher (Designing for Learning, USA), Caroline Howard (HC Consulting, USA), Lorraine Justice (Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)and Karen D. Schenk (K. D. Schenk and Associates Consulting, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-198-8.ch268
Purchase
|
Abstract
Effective communication of the grading process to students is a concern that many online instructors face. The purpose of this entry is to show how the use of a rubric as an assessment tool clarifies for distance education instructors and their students the expectations, criteria, and performance levels of assignments, plus – more importantly – how the rubric details the description of the earned grade. Many student activities can be assessed similarly in a distance learning situation to the building-based environment. There are traditional assignments, such as multiple choice tests and homework, which measure students’ ability to absorb content information. Alternate assessments—such as paintings, stories, projects, essays, portfolios, journals, web page designs, simulations, group activities, PowerPoint® presentations, self-evaluations, etc.—ask the student to demonstrate their knowledge about the learning process or the quality and effectiveness of some product that they have authored.
Related Content
Sylvia Robertson.
© 2023.
28 pages.
|
Dimitrios Stamovlasis, Charalampos Tsanidis.
© 2023.
23 pages.
|
Ikram Chelliq, Lamya Anoir, Mohamed Erradi, Mohamed Khaldi.
© 2023.
26 pages.
|
Vasiliki Ioakeimidou.
© 2023.
27 pages.
|
Eleni Bonti.
© 2023.
25 pages.
|
Lamya Anoir, Ikram Chelliq, Mohamed Erradi, Mohamed Khaldi.
© 2023.
29 pages.
|
Shibu Puthalath, M. R. Mallaiah, Viswesh Sekhar.
© 2023.
17 pages.
|
|
|