IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Self-Regulation in Instant Messaging (IM): Failures, Strategies, and Negative Consequences

Self-Regulation in Instant Messaging (IM): Failures, Strategies, and Negative Consequences
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Anabel Quan-Haase (University of Western Ontario, Canada)
Copyright: 2012
Pages: 22
Source title: Advancing Collaborative Knowledge Environments: New Trends in E-Collaboration
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Ned Kock (Texas A&M International University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-459-8.ch009

Purchase

View Self-Regulation in Instant Messaging (IM): Failures, Strategies, and Negative Consequences on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Despite the advantages of using instant messaging (IM) for collaborative work, concerns about negative consequences associated with its disruptive nature have been raised. In this paper, the author investigates the mediating role of self-regulation, using a mixed methods approach consisting of questionnaires, focus groups, and interviews. The findings show that these concerns are warranted: IM is disruptive, and multitasking can lead to losses in productivity. Despite these negative consequences, users are active participants in IM and employ a wide range of self-regulation strategies (SRS) to control their overuse. The study found three key SRS: ignoring incoming messages, denying access, and digital or physical removal. The study also found two different approaches to self-regulation. The preventive approach, consisting of creating routines and practices around IM use that would help regulation, and the recuperative approach, consisting of changing behaviors after overuse had occurred. Communication via IM helps in the development of social capital by strengthening social ties among users, which can be useful for information exchange and cooperation. These positive effects provide a balance to the potential negative impact on productivity. Implications for theories of self-regulation of technology and for managerial practice are also discussed.

Related Content

Prasanna Ranjith Christodoss, Rajesh Natarajan. © 2022. 14 pages.
K. Uday Kiran, Gowtham Mamidisetti, Chandra shaker Pittala, V. Vijay, Rajeev Ratna Vallabhuni. © 2022. 12 pages.
Amalraj Irudayasamy, Prasanna Ranjith Christotodoss, Rajesh Natarajan. © 2022. 20 pages.
Koppula Srinivas Rao, S. Saravanan, Kasula Raghu, V. Rajesh, Pattem Sampath Kumar. © 2022. 15 pages.
Swapna B., Arulmozhi P., Kamalahasan M., Anuradha V., Meenaakumari M., Hemasundari H., Aathilakshmi T.. © 2022. 21 pages.
Archana K. S., Sivakumar B., Siva Prasad Reddy K.V, Arul Stephen C., Vijayalakshmi A., Ebenezer Abishek B.. © 2022. 15 pages.
Swapna B., M. Kamalahasan, S. Gayathri, S. Srinidhi, H. Hemasundari, S. Sowmiya, S. Shavan Kumar. © 2022. 12 pages.
Body Bottom