Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Shifting Trends in Evaluating the Credibility of CMC

Shifting Trends in Evaluating the Credibility of CMC
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Shawn Apostel (Eastern Kentucky University, USA) and Moe Folk (Kutztown University of Pennsylvania, USA)
Copyright: 2008
Pages: 11
Source title: Handbook of Research on Computer Mediated Communication
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Sigrid Kelsey (Louisiana State University, USA) and Kirk St.Amant (East Carolina University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-863-5.ch014


View Shifting Trends in Evaluating the Credibility of CMC on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.


Given the rapid development and dissemination of various information types within CMC, source evaluation methodology is increasingly difficult and has been complicated further by dominant academic approaches. We trace the reification of book-based evaluation criteria and how its exalted status has been undergirded by a mentality that reinscribes old patterns of credibility onto wholly new entities such as the World Wide Web. Additionally, we trace the development and implementation of these book-based criteria from an influential article to their various incarnations in the MLA handbook, an examination that reveals how CMC has been ignored, then sequestered, and ultimately embraced, albeit lukewarmly. Finally, we will recommend using a rhetorical approach to source evaluation, which can be easily applied to assignments in the composition classroom.

Related Content

Michelle Willis. © 2019. 21 pages.
Kamna Sahni, Kenneth Appiah. © 2019. 21 pages.
Guida Helal, Wilson Ozuem. © 2019. 40 pages.
Ali Usman, Sebastian Okafor. © 2019. 21 pages.
Md Nazmul Islam, Vivek Chitran. © 2019. 20 pages.
Charanya Nopnukulvised, Laden Husamaldin, Gordon Bowen. © 2019. 18 pages.
Guida Helal. © 2019. 30 pages.
Body Bottom