IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Study and Non-Study Related Technologies use of Flemish students in Higher Education

Study and Non-Study Related Technologies use of Flemish students in Higher Education
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Steven Bruneel (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium), Jan Elen (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium), Kurt De Wit (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium) and Jef C. Verhoeven (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium)
Copyright: 2012
Pages: 22
Source title: Student Reactions to Learning with Technologies: Perceptions and Outcomes
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Kathryn Moyle (Charles Darwin University, Australia) and Guus Wijngaards (Inholland University, The Netherlands)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-177-1.ch011

Purchase

View Study and Non-Study Related Technologies use of Flemish students in Higher Education on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

“Living technologies”, such as social networking sites and mobile phones are, nowadays, the subject of educational research. In this chapter we attempt to shed light on the relationship between the reasons for the use of living technologies and learning technologies from students’ perspectives. In this exploratory research project, 15 students were interviewed several times throughout the academic year and 143 students, from various bachelor programs at a Flemish university (Flanders/Belgium) completed an online survey. Results demonstrate that these students make a clear distinction with regard to the frequency and reasons for use of living technologies and learning technologies, with these students rarely use living technologies (for instance, Facebook or mobile phones) for educational purposes. Results are explained in terms of privacy and the reluctance to use particular applications for several non-educational reasons. We end with some possible suggestions for follow-up research.

Related Content

Badrul Huda Khan. © 2021. 14 pages.
Harvey Singh. © 2021. 9 pages.
Saida Affouneh, Soheil Salha, Zuheir Khlaif. © 2021. 11 pages.
Ebba S. I. Ossiannilsson. © 2021. 17 pages.
Prof. Alham Abuatiq. © 2021. 20 pages.
Pradeep Kumar Misra, Sanjaya Mishra. © 2021. 25 pages.
Arun Mittal. © 2021. 15 pages.
Body Bottom