The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
The Temporal Disciplining of Doctoral Research in the Neoliberal Academy: Winners and Losers in the Timely Completion
|
|
Author(s): Deanna Grant-Smith (Queensland University of Technology, Australia) and Abbe Winter (Queensland University of Technology, Australia)
Copyright: 2022
Pages: 21
Source title:
Policy and Practice Challenges for Equality in Education
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Theresa Neimann (Oregon State University, USA), Jonathan J. Felix (RMIT University, Vietnam), Elena Shliakhovchuk (National Transport University, Ukraine) and Lynne L. Hindman (Oregon State University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-7379-2.ch011
Purchase
|
Abstract
The neoliberal agenda in higher education has led to expectations and targets of market-likeness in student enrolment and completion demographics through the widening participation agenda. However, the reality is that disadvantaged groups such as students with a disability and Indigenous students are still underrepresented, particularly in advanced research degrees. This disadvantage is compounded by the temporal disciplining imposed by bureaucratically-defined completion deadlines. Taking Australia as a paradigmatic case, this chapter explores the temporal disciplining of doctoral research in the broader context of neoTaylorism and the projectification of research. It argues that a care-inspired slowness is needed to counterbalance the harms created by the managerialist push for ‘timely' completion.
Related Content
|
Lina Kurchenko.
© 2022.
23 pages.
|
|
Aylin Çakıroğlu Çevik.
© 2022.
15 pages.
|
|
Tricia J. Stewart, Robin Throne, Lesley Anne Evans.
© 2022.
16 pages.
|
|
M. E. Kamogelo Setati-Legodi, Leila Goosen.
© 2022.
22 pages.
|
|
Sylvia Nienhaus.
© 2022.
24 pages.
|
|
Kathy-Anne Jordan, Susan Mariano Lapidus, Sudha Ramaswamy.
© 2022.
21 pages.
|
|
Jason Hung.
© 2022.
48 pages.
|
|
|