IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Transitioning to Government Shared Services Centres: A Systems View

Transitioning to Government Shared Services Centres: A Systems View
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Torben Tambo (Aarhus University, Denmark)and Lars Bækgaard (Aarhus University, Denmark)
Copyright: 2014
Pages: 31
Source title: A Systemic Perspective to Managing Complexity with Enterprise Architecture
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Pallab Saha (National University of Singapore, Singapore)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4518-9.ch011

Purchase

View Transitioning to Government Shared Services Centres: A Systems View on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Services are fundamental to the provisioning of business activities. Enterprise Architecture (EA) is maintaining the relationship between strategy, business, and technology. A clear definition and agreed understanding of services is critical to realising information technology artefacts. Services, however, tend to be more complex than the mere act of interaction or working processes, and should be seen out of the cultural, organisational, and managerial factors surrounding them. This chapter uses a service model consisting of execution, context, and intention with an underlying claim that all three elements must be present to make services meaningful. EA must be seen in the light of this. This chapter addresses the issues related to combined transformation of organisations, service systems, and consequently, EA. The transformation changes loosely coupled, distributed organisations into Shared Service Centres (SSCs). A case study of a far-reaching SSC transformation from Denmark is presented where eGovernment services are moved from local government level into a national SSC structure referred to as Udbetaling Danmark (lit. PayDK). Major findings include: (1) When eGovernment reaches a certain level of maturity, it dissolves its original reason and no longer follows a progressive maturity model. Instead, it leads to a more radical reorganisation emphasising operational efficiency. (2) Development and management of complexities and uncertainties in governmental administrative services are closely associated with the development of eGovernment through ongoing refinement of EA and service frameworks. (3) The policy-driven reshaping of governmental services, originally themselves being SSCs, can lead to iterative SSC formations, each seeking to establish a professional logic of its own. (4) The systemic perception connected to EA and service science provides valuable insight into service transformation before, during, and after the transformation. This chapter aims at a deeper understanding and discussion of services in developing eGovernment policies and architectures, but findings are readily applicable in general business environments.

Related Content

Margee Hume, Paul Johnston. © 2017. 19 pages.
Jessy Nair, D. Bhanu Sree Reddy. © 2017. 27 pages.
Joseph R. Muscatello, Diane H. Parente, Matthew Swinarski. © 2017. 19 pages.
Klaus Wölfel. © 2017. 33 pages.
Rui Pedro Marques. © 2017. 21 pages.
Ebru E. Saygili, Arikan Tarik Saygili. © 2017. 17 pages.
Aparna Raman, D. P. Goyal. © 2017. 41 pages.
Body Bottom