IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Understanding the Hidden Dissatisfaction of Users Towards End User Computing

Understanding the Hidden Dissatisfaction of Users Towards End User Computing
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Nancy C. Shaw (George Mason University, USA), JJoo-Eng Lee-Partridge (Central Connecticut State University, USA)and James S.K. Ang (National University of Singapore, Singapore)
Copyright: 2004
Pages: 24
Source title: Advanced Topics in End User Computing, Volume 3
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Mo Adam Mahmood (University of Texas at El Paso, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-257-2.ch011

Purchase

View Understanding the Hidden Dissatisfaction of Users Towards End User Computing on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

The objective of this research is to examine satisfied and dissatisfied end users in an organization to determine if they hold different technological frames of reference towards end user computing (EUC). This research examines the effectiveness of the computer systems at the organization, while at the same time measuring the level of end user satisfaction with the EUC environment. Grounded theory techniques for qualitative analysis of interviews were used to assess the technological frames of reference of selected highly satisfied and highly dissatisfied users. While analysis of the satisfaction surveys alone indicated that the user population was generally satisfied with their EUC environment, follow-up interviews and service quality gap analysis highlighted several individual support areas that required remedial action. In addition, satisfied and dissatisfied users held different views or technological frames of reference towards the technology they used. Their frames of reference affected their expectations of the technology, their interactions with the MIS support staff, and their utilization of the technology on a day-to-day basis.

Related Content

Rod D. Roscoe, Russell J. Branaghan, Nancy J. Cooke, Scotty D. Craig. © 2018. 34 pages.
Steve Ritter, R. Charles Murray, Robert G. M. Hausmann. © 2018. 17 pages.
Yvonne S. Kao, Bryan J. Matlen, Michelle Tiu, Linlin Li. © 2018. 24 pages.
Melissa L. Stone, Kevin M. Kent, Rod D. Roscoe, Kathleen M. Corley, Laura K. Allen, Danielle S. McNamara. © 2018. 23 pages.
Elizabeth R. Kazakoff, Melissa Orkin, Kristine Bundschuh, Rachel L. Schechter. © 2018. 24 pages.
Irfan Kula, Russell J. Branaghan, Robert K. Atkinson, Rod D. Roscoe. © 2018. 17 pages.
Erin Walker, Ruth Wylie, Andreea Danielescu, James P. Rodriguez III, Ed Finn. © 2018. 19 pages.
Body Bottom