The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Virtual Work Research Agenda
Abstract
The paper by Bélanger, Watson-Manheim, and Jordan (2002) addresses the gap between research conducted and practitioner concerns in virtual work. One of the key difficulties in conducting research in this area is the overlap between terms used (McCloskey & Igbaria, 1998; Pinsonneault & Boisvert, 2001). While there are other distributed work arrangements such as hotelling, neighborhood work centers and flextime, most of the previous literature has focused on telecommuting (telework) and virtual teams/ organizations. In this article, the term virtual work represents work environments where individuals spend some time working in a non-face-to-face (FTF) mode, using information and communication technologies to perform work activities. Virtual work environments are increasingly employed by organizations. While there is increased complexity and potential for problems, virtual work strategies allow organizations a great deal of flexibility to compete in a rapidly changing business environment. While existing research provides insights into such environments, it does not clearly deal with major concerns faced by managers (referred to as the “gap” between research and practice). One of the potential reasons for this gap is that practicing managers are concerned with current challenges in their own work setting while academics are concerned with developing more generalizable rules and understanding.
Related Content
|
Christine Kosmopoulos.
© 2022.
22 pages.
|
|
Melkamu Beyene, Solomon Mekonnen Tekle, Daniel Gelaw Alemneh.
© 2022.
21 pages.
|
|
Rajkumari Sofia Devi, Ch. Ibohal Singh.
© 2022.
21 pages.
|
|
Ida Fajar Priyanto.
© 2022.
16 pages.
|
|
Murtala Ismail Adakawa.
© 2022.
27 pages.
|
|
Shimelis Getu Assefa.
© 2022.
17 pages.
|
|
Angela Y. Ford, Daniel Gelaw Alemneh.
© 2022.
22 pages.
|
|
|