Attribution

View Sample PDF

Author(s): Clement Guitton (King's College London, UK)
Copyright: 2015
Pages: 24
Source title: Cybersecurity Policies and Strategies for Cyberwarfare Prevention
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Jean-Loup Richet (University of Nantes, France)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8456-0.ch003

Keywords: Cyber Warfare & Terrorism / Cyber Warfare and Cyber Terrorism / Information Science Reference / Security & Forensics

Purchase

View Attribution on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Attribution, finding the identity of actors behind an attack, is of primary importance to be able to classify an attack as a criminal act, an act of war, or an act of terrorism. But attribution is difficult. Many experts and analysts have explained this difficulty with technical arguments. This chapter seeks to bring nuances to such arguments closely analysing how attribution functions. It brings a focus on political factors constraining attribution, and on specifically three ones: standards of evidence, time, and private companies. It makes three main arguments. Firstly, standards of evidence are only secondary to the political will to attribute an attack. Secondly, time cannot only be reduced; the context surrounding attribution is as much important. Thirdly, companies' important role in attribution also gives ground for accused party to easily undermine their claims. The chapter concludes with opening up the debate on the usefulness of meta-data for attribution.

The IRMA Community

Research IRM

Attribution

Purchase

Abstract

Related Content

IRMA Sponsors