IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Automatic Correspondence Methods towards Point-Based Medical Image Registration: An Evaluation Study

Automatic Correspondence Methods towards Point-Based Medical Image Registration: An Evaluation Study
View Sample PDF
Author(s): George K. Matsopoulos (National Technical University of Athens, Greece)
Copyright: 2009
Pages: 19
Source title: Handbook of Research on Advanced Techniques in Diagnostic Imaging and Biomedical Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Themis P. Exarchos (University of Ioannina, Greece ), Athanasios Papadopoulos (University of Ioannina, Greece )and Dimitrios I. Fotiadis (University of Ioannina, Greece )
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-314-2.ch026

Purchase

View Automatic Correspondence Methods towards Point-Based Medical Image Registration: An Evaluation Study on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

The accurate estimation of point correspondences is often required in a wide variety of medical image processing applications including image registration. Numerous point correspondence methods have been proposed, each exhibiting its own characteristics, strengths and weaknesses. This chapter presents a comparative study of four automatic point correspondence methods. The four featured methods are the Automatic Extraction of Corresponding Points approach, the Trimmed Iterated Closest Points scheme, the Correspondence by Sensitivity to Movement technique and the Self-Organizing Maps network. All methods are presented, mainly focusing on their distinct characteristics. An extensive set of dental images, subject to unknown transformations, was employed for the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the four methods, which was performed in terms of registration accuracy. After assessing all methods, it was deduced that the Self-Organizing Maps approach outperformed in most cases the other three methods in comparison.

Related Content

Julia Zimmer, Elisa Degenkolbe, Britt Wildemann, Petra Seemann. © 2013. 30 pages.
George I. Lambrou, Maria Adamaki, Apostolos Zaravinos. © 2013. 22 pages.
Svetoslav Nikolov, Mukhtar Ullah, Momchil Nenov, Julio Vera Gonzalez, Peter Raasch, Olaf Wolkenhauer. © 2013. 23 pages.
Ana M. Sotoca, Michael Weber, Everardus J. J. van Zoelen. © 2013. 19 pages.
Franz Ricklefs, Sonja Schrepfer. © 2013. 16 pages.
Sonja Schallenberg, Cathleen Petzold, Julia Riewaldt, Karsten Kretschmer. © 2013. 25 pages.
Ali Mobasheri. © 2013. 32 pages.
Body Bottom