The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Comparing the Socio-Political Ethics of Fighting Terrorism With Extreme Self-Defense in USA: An Exploratory Insight
Abstract
In this study the authors adopted a post-positivist research design philosophy to explore the likelihood that Americans would support extreme self-defense policies like torture, reducing human rights or banning Muslims to fight against global terrorism, especially after 9/11 and in light of the Trump conservative government. The authors grounded their research questions into the literature to form hypotheses in a correlational design strategy which they tested using nonparametric statistics. They collected opinions from 3213 Americans during 2016-2017 about applying extreme self-defense tactics to combat global terrorism and how these opinions contrasted between those holding a conservative versus liberal or other individualistic socio-political ideology. The surprising results were that American citizens did not unanimously endorse banning Muslims (only 30% supported the policy and 6% were undecided) but the majority (51%) of participants sanctioned torture as a self-defense to combat global terrorism.
Related Content
|
Guru Prasad M. S., Praveen Gujjar, H. N. Naveen Kumar, M. Anand Kumar, S. Chandrappa.
© 2023.
14 pages.
|
|
Bhawnesh Kumar, Ashwani Kumar, Harendra Singh Negi, Javed Alam.
© 2023.
15 pages.
|
|
Abhishek Kumar, Karan Singh.
© 2023.
21 pages.
|
|
Anuj Singh, Somjit Mandal, Kamlesh Chandra Purohit.
© 2023.
21 pages.
|
|
Muthumanikandan Vanamoorthy.
© 2023.
13 pages.
|
|
Janmejay Pant, Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Himanshu Pant, Devendra Singh, Durgesh Pant.
© 2023.
11 pages.
|
|
Siddhardha Kollabathini.
© 2023.
9 pages.
|
|
|