IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Medical Case Based Reasoning Frameworks: Current Developments and Future Directions

Medical Case Based Reasoning Frameworks: Current Developments and Future Directions
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Shaker El-Sappagh (Faculty of Computers and Information, Minia University, Egypt)and Mohammed Mahfouz Elmogy (Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, Egypt)
Copyright: 2020
Pages: 37
Source title: Virtual and Mobile Healthcare: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-9863-3.ch025

Purchase

View Medical Case Based Reasoning Frameworks: Current Developments and Future Directions on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) is one of the most suitable AI techniques for building clinical decision support systems. Medical domain complexity introduces many challenges for building these systems. Building the systems' knowledge base from the Electronic Health Record (EHR), the encoding of case-base knowledge with standard medical ontology, and the handling of vague data are examples of these challenges. Although several advantages of using CBR in medicine have been identified, there are no real systems acceptable to physicians. This systematic review examines the current state of CBR and its limitations in the medical domain, especially for diabetes mellitus. The critical evaluation of the status of diabetes CBR systems presents unique opportunities for improving these systems. The literature review covers most of the English language studies extracted from relevant databases by using search terms relating CBR, ontology, Fuzzy, and standard terminology concepts. The authors identify 38 articles published between 1999 and 15 January 2015, which represent original researches in CBR domain. The study includes 15 (39.5%) non-medical studies and 23 (60.5%) medical studies with ~22% for diabetes CBR. A list of 18 integrated evaluation metrics has been proposed and used in the analysis. The results show that the non-medical CBR systems achieved higher advances (50%) than medical systems (42.9%). In addition, the diabetes management CBR systems achieve the lowest advances (21.4%) compared to other systems. These shortages explain the question “why CBR paradigm are not fully utilized in the commercial medical systems?” As a result, there is a distinct need for more comprehensive enhancements in clinical CBR especially diabetes systems.

Related Content

Genevieve Z. Steiner-Lim, Madilyn Coles, Kayla Jaye, Najwa-Joelle Metri, Ali S. Butt, Katerina Christofides, Jackson McPartland, Zainab Al-Modhefer, Diana Karamacoska, Ethan Russo, Tim Karl. © 2023. 47 pages.
Mohd Kashif, Mohammad Waseem, Poornima D. Vijendra, Ashok Kumar Pandurangan. © 2023. 28 pages.
Courtney R. Acker, Rana R. Zeine. © 2023. 27 pages.
Mahesh Pattabhiramaiah, Shanthala Mallikarjunaiah. © 2023. 16 pages.
Dhairavi Shah, Dhaara Shah, Yara Mohamed, Danna Rosas, Alyssa Moffitt, Theresa Hearn Haynes, Francis Cortes, Taunjah Bell Neasman, Phani kumar Kathari, Ana Villagran, Rana R. Zeine. © 2023. 28 pages.
Mohammad Uzair, Hammad Qaiser, Muhammad Arshad, Aneesa Zafar, Shahid Bashir. © 2023. 23 pages.
Akila Muthuramalingam, Ashok Kumar Pandurangan, Subhamoy Banerjee. © 2023. 17 pages.
Body Bottom