IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

The Right to Public Privacy under Surveillance: CCTV Technology and the Myth of ‘Public Security’

The Right to Public Privacy under Surveillance: CCTV Technology and the Myth of ‘Public Security’
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Christina M. Akrivopoulou (Democritus University of Thrace, Greece)
Copyright: 2012
Pages: 8
Source title: Human Rights and Risks in the Digital Era: Globalization and the Effects of Information Technologies
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Christina M. Akrivopoulou (Democritus University of Thrace, Greece)and Nicolaos Garipidis (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-0891-7.ch003

Purchase

View The Right to Public Privacy under Surveillance: CCTV Technology and the Myth of ‘Public Security’ on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This chapter is critically commenting on the augmenting policy of public surveillance through the ‘Public Camera Surveillance’ system (CCTV technology) in Greece and in other countries such as the UK, USA, Canada, and Australia. It presents the arguments in favor and against such policies and the main threats that such policy-making poses for the freedom of the individual as represented in the relevant jurisprudence of the ECtHR. The main argument of the presentation underlines the need for the interpretive deduction of a right to anonymity or otherwise of a right to public privacy from the traditional notion of privacy. This right enables the individual to enjoy his/her privacy in public, thus allowing him/her to circulate in public assured that his/her presence will remain anonymous and permitting him/her to merge within the rest of the crowd. Such a right is specifically valuable in order to protect the political autonomy of the individual as a participant of demonstrations and public movements or manifestations under the precondition that his/her deeds do not merit the state’s intervention. The presentation closes with some remarks on the changing social and political ethos that brings forward the demand of public surveillance as a need for public safety.

Related Content

Maja Pucelj, Matjaž Mulej, Anita Hrast. © 2024. 29 pages.
Hemendra Singh. © 2024. 26 pages.
Nestor Soler del Toro. © 2024. 27 pages.
Pablo Banchio. © 2024. 18 pages.
Jože Ruparčič. © 2024. 26 pages.
Anuttama Ghose, Hartej Singh Kochher, S. M. Aamir Ali. © 2024. 28 pages.
Bhupinder Singh, Komal Vig, Pushan Kumar Dutta, Christian Kaunert, Bhupendra Kumar Gautam. © 2024. 23 pages.
Body Bottom