The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
A Study of Information Requirement Determination Process of an Executive Information System
Abstract
An executive information system (EIS) provides senior management with easy access to information relevant to their needs. It can spread horizontally across and vertically down to other organizational managers and provide three major types of benefits: information, management support, and organizational support (Salmeron, 2002). According to Salmeron, one key EIS success factor is the fulfillment of users’ information needs. However, the user information requirements determination (IRD) process during the implementation of an EIS remains a problematic exercise for most organizations (Walter, Jiang, & Klein, 2003). This is because IRD is the least understood and least formalized yet most critical phase of the information systems development (ISD) process. This phase is so crucial that many information systems researchers argue that IRD is the single most important stage during an EIS project development process, and if the IRD is inaccurate and incomplete, the resultant system will also be inaccurate and incomplete. Hence, understanding the issues that influence the IRD process of EIS is of critical importance to organizations (Poon & Wagner, 2001). However, little is known about the issues that influence IRD processes during the implementation of an EIS project (Khalil, 2005). Therefore, this article aims to examine key issues surrounding the IRD process during the implementation of an EIS project in a large Australian public-sector organization. The article first reviews relevant literature with respect to IRD and EIS. Key findings and issues identified from the case study are also presented. The article examines these findings and issues in light of these organizations’ IRD practices, and concludes by providing some lessons for EIS project implementation.
Related Content
|
Margee Hume, Paul Johnston.
© 2017.
19 pages.
|
|
Jessy Nair, D. Bhanu Sree Reddy.
© 2017.
27 pages.
|
|
Joseph R. Muscatello, Diane H. Parente, Matthew Swinarski.
© 2017.
19 pages.
|
|
Klaus Wölfel.
© 2017.
33 pages.
|
|
Rui Pedro Marques.
© 2017.
21 pages.
|
|
Ebru E. Saygili, Arikan Tarik Saygili.
© 2017.
17 pages.
|
|
Aparna Raman, D. P. Goyal.
© 2017.
41 pages.
|
|
|