IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Using Fuzzy Goal Programming with Penalty Functions for Solving EEPGD Problem via Genetic Algorithm

Using Fuzzy Goal Programming with Penalty Functions for Solving EEPGD Problem via Genetic Algorithm
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Mousumi Kumar (Aghorekamini Prakashchandra Mahavidyalaya, India), Valentina E. Balas (University of Arad B-dul Revolutiei 77, Romania)and Bijay Baran Pal (University of Kalyani, India)
Copyright: 2016
Pages: 23
Source title: Handbook of Research on Natural Computing for Optimization Problems
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Jyotsna Kumar Mandal (University of Kalyani, India), Somnath Mukhopadhyay (Calcutta Business School, India)and Tandra Pal (National Institute of Technology Durgapur, India)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0058-2.ch034

Purchase

View Using Fuzzy Goal Programming with Penalty Functions for Solving EEPGD Problem via Genetic Algorithm on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This chapter presents how the concept of penalty functions is incorporated within the framework of Fuzzy Goal Programming (FGP) for modelling and solving Economic-Environmental Power Generation and Dispatch (EEPGD) problems by employing genetic algorithms. In model formulation, first penalty functions to measuring membership values of defined fuzzy goals are presented. Then, minsum FGP method is used to obtain rank based solution in imprecise environment. In the process of solving the problem, a GA scheme is implemented at two different stages. At the first stage, optimal solutions of objective functions are determined for fuzzy representation of each of them. At the second stage, evaluation of achievement function to arrive at the highest membership value of fuzzily described objective goals is taken into account. The standard IEEE 6-Generator 30-Bus test system is considered to illustrate the approach. A comparison of model solution with the solutions of conventional approaches is also made to highlight the potential use of the approach.

Related Content

P. Chitra, A. Saleem Raja, V. Sivakumar. © 2024. 24 pages.
K. Ezhilarasan, K. Somasundaram, T. Kalaiselvi, Praveenkumar Somasundaram, S. Karthigai Selvi, A. Jeevarekha. © 2024. 36 pages.
Kande Archana, V. Kamakshi Prasad, M. Ashok. © 2024. 17 pages.
Ritesh Kumar Jain, Kamal Kant Hiran. © 2024. 23 pages.
U. Vignesh, R. Elakya. © 2024. 13 pages.
S. Karthigai Selvi, R. Siva Shankar, K. Ezhilarasan. © 2024. 16 pages.
Vemasani Varshini, Maheswari Raja, Sharath Kumar Jagannathan. © 2024. 20 pages.
Body Bottom