IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

The Role of Expertise in Peer Feedback Analysis: Exploring Variables and Factors in a Translation Context

The Role of Expertise in Peer Feedback Analysis: Exploring Variables and Factors in a Translation Context
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Sonia Vandepitte (Ghent University, Belgium)and Joleen Hanson (University of Wisconsin – Stout, USA)
Copyright: 2019
Pages: 22
Source title: Quality Assurance and Assessment Practices in Translation and Interpreting
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Elsa Huertas-Barros (University of Westminster, UK), Sonia Vandepitte (Universiteit Gent, Belgium)and Emilia Iglesias-Fernández (Universidad de Granada, Spain)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5225-3.ch014

Purchase

View The Role of Expertise in Peer Feedback Analysis: Exploring Variables and Factors in a Translation Context on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Since Kiraly pointed out the beneficial role of collaboration in translation training, increasingly more attention has been paid to the potential benefits of peer collaboration. While Wang and Han studied translation trainees' explicit perceptions of any benefits resulting from peer feedback, the present contribution first investigates the role of translator's implicit perceptions of reviewer expertise in the effectiveness of a peer comment in a case study. It then inquires into the number and type of peer feedback comments in relation to whether the target language that is to be reviewed is the reviewer's L1 or L2. Here, two data sets are hypothesized to yield similar results: (1) a set of native and non-native reviewer comments and (2) the comments written by translators in a direct translation situation and in an inverse translation situation. Findings were surprising, however, and professional, methodological, and theoretical research implications for translation and revision competence models are suggested.

Related Content

Sunil Kumar, Nishi Patel, Paturi Jagadeeswar Reddy. © 2024. 18 pages.
Soumya Sankar Ghosh. © 2024. 24 pages.
Hilda Abraham Mwangakala. © 2024. 21 pages.
Alaattin Parlakkılıç. © 2024. 22 pages.
Subir Sinha. © 2024. 22 pages.
Minaxi Parmar. © 2024. 19 pages.
Poonam Arora, Nidhi Arora. © 2024. 17 pages.
Body Bottom