IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Evaluation Platform for DDM Algorithms With the Usage of Non-Uniform Data Distribution Strategies

Evaluation Platform for DDM Algorithms With the Usage of Non-Uniform Data Distribution Strategies
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Mikołaj Markiewicz (Warsaw University of Technology, Poland)and Jakub Koperwas (Warsaw University of Technology, Poland)
Copyright: 2022
Volume: 15
Issue: 1
Pages: 23
Source title: International Journal of Information Technologies and Systems Approach (IJITSA)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sangbing (Jason) Tsai (International Engineering and Technology Institute (IETI), Hong Kong)and Wei Liu (Qingdao University, China)
DOI: 10.4018/IJITSA.290000

Purchase

View Evaluation Platform for DDM Algorithms With the Usage of Non-Uniform Data Distribution Strategies on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Huge amounts of data are collected in numerous independent data storage facilities around the world. However, how the data is distributed between physical locations remains unspecified. Downloading all of the data for the purpose of processing it is undesirable and sometimes even impossible. Various methods have been proposed for performing data mining tasks, but the main problem is the lack of an objective strategy for comparing them. The authors present current research on a novel evaluation platform for distributed data mining (DDM) algorithms. The proposed platform opens up a new field to evaluate algorithms in terms of the quality of the results, transfer used, and speed, but also for the use of a non-uniform data distribution among independent nodes during algorithm evaluation. This work introduces a ‘data partitioning strategy’ term referring to a specific, not necessarily uniform data distribution. A brief evaluation for three clustering algorithms is also reported, showing the usability and simplicity of identifying differences in processing with the use of the platform.

Related Content

Tianlong Wang, Chaoyang Wang, Zhiqiang Liu, Shuai Ma, Huibo Yan. © 2024. 15 pages.
Xudong Cao, Chenchen Chen, Lejia Zhang, Li Pan. © 2024. 25 pages.
Shengfeng Xie, Jingwei Li. © 2024. 20 pages.
Xiaoyuan Wang, Hongfei Wang, Jianping Wang, Jiajia Wang. © 2024. 24 pages.
Jiao Hao, Zongbao Zhang, Yihan Ping. © 2024. 14 pages.
Qinmei Wang. © 2024. 13 pages.
Wenzhen Mai, Mohamud Saeed Ambashe, Chukwuka Christian Ohueri. © 2024. 18 pages.
Body Bottom