IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

A Beam Search Based Decision Tree Induction Algorithm

A Beam Search Based Decision Tree Induction Algorithm
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Márcio Porto Basgalupp (Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil), Rodrigo Coelho Barros (University of Sao Paulo (ICMC-USP), Brazil), André C. P. L. F. de Carvalho (University of Sao Paulo (ICMC-USP), Brazil)and Alex A. Freitas (University of Kent, UK)
Copyright: 2012
Pages: 14
Source title: Machine Learning Algorithms for Problem Solving in Computational Applications: Intelligent Techniques
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Siddhivinayak Kulkarni (University of Ballarat, Australia)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-1833-6.ch020

Purchase

View A Beam Search Based Decision Tree Induction Algorithm on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Decision tree induction algorithms are highly used in a variety of domains for knowledge discovery and pattern recognition. They have the advantage of producing a comprehensible classification model and satisfactory accuracy levels in several application domains. Most well-known decision tree induction algorithms perform a greedy top-down strategy for node partitioning that may lead to sub-optimal solutions that overfit the training data. Some alternatives for the greedy strategy are the use of ensemble of classifiers or, more recently, the employment of the evolutionary algorithms (EA) paradigm to evolve decision trees by performing a global search in the space of candidate trees. Both strategies have their own disadvantages, like the lack of comprehensible solutions (in the case of ensembles) or the high computation cost of EAs. Hence, the authors of this chapter present a new algorithm that seeks to avoid being trapped in local-optima by doing a beam search during the decision tree growth. In addition, their strategy keeps the comprehensibility of the traditional methods and is much less time-consuming than evolutionary algorithms.

Related Content

Bhargav Naidu Matcha, Sivakumar Sivanesan, K. C. Ng, Se Yong Eh Noum, Aman Sharma. © 2023. 60 pages.
Lavanya Sendhilvel, Kush Diwakar Desai, Simran Adake, Rachit Bisaria, Hemang Ghanshyambhai Vekariya. © 2023. 15 pages.
Jayanthi Ganapathy, Purushothaman R., Ramya M., Joselyn Diana C.. © 2023. 14 pages.
Prince Rajak, Anjali Sagar Jangde, Govind P. Gupta. © 2023. 14 pages.
Mustafa Eren Akpınar. © 2023. 9 pages.
Sreekantha Desai Karanam, Krithin M., R. V. Kulkarni. © 2023. 34 pages.
Omprakash Nayak, Tejaswini Pallapothala, Govind P. Gupta. © 2023. 19 pages.
Body Bottom