IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Beyond RoboDebt: The Future of Robotic Process Automation

Beyond RoboDebt: The Future of Robotic Process Automation
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Michael D'Rosario (Deakin University, Burwood, Australia)and Carlene D'Rosario (Independent Researcher, Australia)
Copyright: 2022
Pages: 27
Source title: Research Anthology on Cross-Disciplinary Designs and Applications of Automation
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-3694-3.ch013

Purchase

View Beyond RoboDebt: The Future of Robotic Process Automation on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Automated decision support systems with high stake decision processes are frequently controversial. The Online Compliance Intervention (herewith “OCI” or “RoboDebt”) is a system of compliance implemented with the intention to facilitate automatic issuance of statutory debt notices to individuals, taking a receipt of welfare payments and exceeding their entitlement. The system appears to employ rudimentary data scraping and expert systems to determine whether notices should be validly issued. However, many individuals that take receipt of debt notices assert that they were issued in error. The commentary on the system has resulted in a lot of conflation of the system with other system types and caused many to question the role of decision of support systems in public administration given the potentially deleterious impacts of such systems for the most vulnerable. The authors employ a taxonomy of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) issues, to review the OCI and RPA more generally. This paper identifies potential problems of bias, inconsistency, procedural fairness, and overall systematic error. This research also considers a series of RoboDebt specific issues regarding contractor arrangements and the potential impact of the system for Australia's Indigenous population. The authors offer a set of recommendations based on the observed challenges, emphasizing the importance of moderation, independent algorithmic audits, and ongoing reviews. Most notably, this paper emphasizes the need for greater transparency and a broadening of criteria to determine vulnerability that encompasses, temporal, geographic, and technological considerations.

Related Content

Hamed Nozari, Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz. © 2024. 15 pages.
Paria Samadi Parviznejad. © 2024. 22 pages.
Masoud Vaseei, Mohammadreza Nasiri Jan Agha, Milad Abolghasemian, Adel Pourghader Chobar. © 2024. 14 pages.
Melisa Ozbiltekin-Pala. © 2024. 21 pages.
Hesamoddin Motevalli. © 2024. 16 pages.
Esmael Najafi, Iman Atighi. © 2024. 14 pages.
Alireza Aliahmadi, Aminmasoud Bakhshi Movahed, Hamed Nozari. © 2024. 20 pages.
Body Bottom