IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Blasphemy and Outrage in a Secular State: Venezuela's Illegitimate Restrictions to Speech Based on a Republican Religion

Blasphemy and Outrage in a Secular State: Venezuela's Illegitimate Restrictions to Speech Based on a Republican Religion
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Néstor Luis Garrido (Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, Venezuela)
Copyright: 2014
Pages: 29
Source title: New Media and Communication Across Religions and Cultures
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Isaac Nahon-Serfaty (University of Ottawa, Canada)and Rukhsana Ahmed (University at Albany, SUNY, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-5035-0.ch012

Purchase


Abstract

In a religious context, blasphemy is defined as a derogatory expression against God or other sacred objects or concepts and is a sin that is defined and punished in theocracies or religious normative frameworks. In secular democracies, some countries, especially those parliamentary kingdoms in Europe, have kept some restrictions to the blasphemous expression in their legal system, but sanctions are never as harsh as in Muslim countries such as Pakistan, where people face death penalty if a judge finds eviction for the crime. In secular regimes, blasphemy is no longer considered a crime or this concept is fading as a punishable fault, but in some countries where a sort of “civil religion” is promoted by the State, outrage—speaking or manifesting contrary, hideous, or disdainful opinion against national symbols or heroes—works as a functional substitute of blasphemy. In this chapter, the authors study the case of Venezuela that could be considered emblematic of a secularist use of religiously inspired notions applied to national symbols in order to justify censorship and control free speech to promote a “forced national consensus.” They discuss the historical roots of these illegitimate restrictions to freedom of speech. The authors also analyze the attempts to use the figure of the deceased president Hugo Chávez to deepen the configuration of a “patriotic religion” in order to curve political dissent and increase social control.

Related Content

Riann Singh, Shalini Ramdeo. © 2023. 26 pages.
Fred Moonga, Trevor Sichombo, Siwa Irene Mwene, Richard Mweemba. © 2023. 18 pages.
Zeinab Asef Arees. © 2023. 16 pages.
Anand Jha, Namita Saxena, Suhel Ahmed Khan, Manoj Kr. Niranjan. © 2023. 31 pages.
Muhammad Faisal Sultan, Imam Uddin, Muhammad Asif, Asim Rafiq. © 2023. 9 pages.
Muhammad Faisal Sultan, Sadia Khurram Shaikh, Aamir Firoz Shamsi, Ghazala Shaukat. © 2023. 11 pages.
Anita Damenshie-Brown, Kingsley Ofosu-Ampong. © 2023. 24 pages.
Body Bottom