The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
The Comparability of Event-Related and General Social Support
|
Author(s): Valentina Hlebec (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia), Maja Mrzel (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)and Tina Kogovšek (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)
Copyright: 2012
Pages: 21
Source title:
Social Network Mining, Analysis, and Research Trends: Techniques and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): I-Hsien Ting (National University of Kaohsiung, Taiwan), Tzung-Pei Hong (National University of Kaohsiung, Taiwan)and Leon Shyue-Liang Wang (National University of Kaohsiung, Taiwan)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-513-7.ch019
Purchase
|
Abstract
Some studies (e.g., Kogovšek & Hlebec, 2008, 2009) have shown that the name generator and the role relation approaches to measuring social networks are to some extent comparable, but less so the name generator and the event-related approaches (Hlebec, Mrzel, & Kogovšek, 2009). In this chapter, the composition of the social support network assessed by both the general social support approach and the event-related approach (support during 15 major life events) is analyzed and compared. In both cases, the role relation approach is used. In addition, in both approaches a more elaborate (16 possible categories ranging from partner, mother, father, friend to no one) and a more simple (6 possible categories ranging from family member, friend, neighbor to no one) response format is applied and compared. The aim of the chapter is to establish, in a controlled quasi-experiment setting, whether the different approaches (i.e. the general social support and the event-related approach) produce similar social networks regardless of the response format (long vs. short).
Related Content
.
© 2023.
34 pages.
|
.
© 2023.
15 pages.
|
.
© 2023.
15 pages.
|
.
© 2023.
18 pages.
|
.
© 2023.
24 pages.
|
.
© 2023.
32 pages.
|
.
© 2023.
21 pages.
|
|
|